What Was the Syntax-Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About?

被引：29
作者：
Lutz, Sebastian [1 ]
机构：
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich Ctr Math Philosophy, Munich, Germany
来源：
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH | 2017年 / 95卷 / 02期
关键词：
EMPIRICAL ADEQUACY; VIEW; EQUIVALENCE;
D O I：
10.1111/phpr.12221
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
The debate between critics of syntactic and semantic approaches to the formalization of scientific theories has been going on for over 50 years. I structure the debate in light of a recent exchange between Hans Halvorson, Clark Glymour, and Bas van Fraassen and argue that the only remaining disagreement concerns the alleged difference in the dependence of syntactic and semantic approaches on languages of predicate logic. This difference turns out to be illusory.
引用
收藏
页码：319 / 352
页数：34
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Semantic Holism in Scientific Language [J].
Andreas, Holger .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2010, 77 (04) :524-543
[2]  
Andréka H, 2005, MATH LOGIC QUART, V51, P591, DOI 10.1002/malq.200410051/www.mlq-journal.org
[3]  
Andrews P.B, 2002, INTRO MATH LOGIC TYP, V27
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MODEL THEORY
[5]  
[Anonymous], MONOGRAPHS MODERN LO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, MODEL THEORY
[7]  
[Anonymous], KSIGA PAMITKOWA MARI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1994, WORDS LIFE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1974, SYNTHESE, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00883104
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1974, STRUCTURE SCI THEORI
1234567