Hydrogen Road Transport Analysis in the Energy System: A Case Study for Germany through 2050

被引:46
作者
Reuss, Markus [1 ]
Dimos, Paris [1 ,2 ]
Leon, Aline [3 ]
Grube, Thomas [1 ]
Robinius, Martin [1 ]
Stolten, Detlef [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Technoecon Syst Anal IEK 3, Wilhelm Johnen Str, D-52428 Julich, Germany
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Appl Mat IAM, Hermann von Helmholtz Pl 1, D-76344 Eggenstein Leopoldshafen, Germany
[3] European Inst Energy Res, Emmy Noether Str 11, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Mech Engn, Chair Fuel Cells, Kackertstr 9, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
关键词
hydrogen transport; hydrogen infrastructure; truck routing; compressed gaseous hydrogen; liquid hydrogen; liquid organic hydrogen carriers; TRANSMISSION PIPELINE NETWORKS; SUPPLY CHAIN; SECTOR; SCENARIO; CARRIERS; STORAGE; FUTURE; POWER; COST; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.3390/en14113166
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Carbon-free transportation is envisaged by means of fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV) propelled by hydrogen that originates from renewably electricity. However, there is a spatial and temporal gap in the production and demand of hydrogen. Therefore, hydrogen storage and transport remain key challenges for sustainable transportation with FCEVs. In this study, we propose a method for calculating a spatially resolved highway routing model for Germany to transport hydrogen by truck from the 15 production locations (source) to the 9683 fueling stations (sink) required by 2050. We consider herein three different storage modes, namely compressed gaseous hydrogen (CGH2), liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHC). The model applies Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm for all available source-sink connections prior to optimizing the supply. By creating a detailed routing result for each source-sink connection, a detour factor is introduced for "first and last mile" transportation. The average detour factor of 1.32 is shown to be necessary for the German highway grid. Thereafter, the related costs, transportation time and travelled distances are calculated and compared for the examined storage modes. The overall transportation cost result for compressed gaseous hydrogen is 2.69 euro/kg(H2), 0.73 euro/kg(H2) for liquid hydrogen, and 0.99 euro/kg(H2) for LOHCs. While liquid hydrogen appears to be the most cost-efficient mode, with the integration of the supply chain costs, compressed gaseous hydrogen is more convenient for minimal source-sink distances, while liquid hydrogen would be suitable for distances greater than 130 km.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Large-scale liquid hydrogen production methods and approaches: A review [J].
Aasadnia, Majid ;
Mehrpooya, Mehdi .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 212 :57-83
[2]   Time development of new hydrogen transmission pipeline networks for France [J].
Andre, Jean ;
Auray, Stephane ;
De Wolf, Daniel ;
Memmah, Mohamed-Mahmoud ;
Simonnet, Antoine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (20) :10323-10337
[3]  
[Anonymous], DATA STAT CO 2 EMISS
[4]  
[Anonymous], OPENSTREETMAP DATA E
[5]   GIS-based scenario calculations for a nationwide German hydrogen pipeline infrastructure [J].
Baufume, Sylvestre ;
Grueger, Fabian ;
Grube, Thomas ;
Krieg, Dennis ;
Linssen, Jochen ;
Weber, Michael ;
Hake, Juergen-Friedrich ;
Stolten, Detlef .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (10) :3813-3829
[6]   prospective cost and environmental impact assessment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles in Germany (vol 24, pg 2220, 2019) [J].
Bekel, Kai ;
Pauliuk, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (04) :831-831
[7]  
Bondy A, 2008, GRAPH THEORY APPL
[8]   Cost assessment and evaluation of various hydrogen delivery scenarios [J].
Demir, Murat Emre ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (22) :10420-10430
[9]  
Dijkstra E. W., 1959, NUMERISCHE MATH, V1, P269, DOI [10.1007/BF01386390/METRICS, 10.1007/BF01386390, DOI 10.1007/BF01386390]
[10]  
Energy TransitionThe Global Energiewende, HEINR BOLL STUFT