Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools

被引:136
作者
Majid, Umair [1 ]
Vanstone, Meredith [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hlth Res Methodol Program, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Family Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, McMaster Fac Hlth Sci Program Educ Res Innovat &, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
quality appraisal; qualitative evidence synthesis; meta-synthesis; appraisal tool; systematic review; STANDARDS; SERVICES; RIGOUR;
D O I
10.1177/1049732318785358
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
As the movement toward evidence-based health policy continues to emphasize the importance of including patient and public perspectives, syntheses of qualitative health research are becoming more common. In response to the focus on independent assessments of rigor in these knowledge products, over 100 appraisal tools for assessing the quality of qualitative research have been developed. The variety of appraisal tools exhibit diverse methods and purposes, reflecting the lack of consensus as to what constitutes appropriate quality criteria for qualitative research. It is a daunting task for those without deep familiarity of the field to choose the best appraisal tool for their purpose. This article provides a description of the structure, content, and objectives of existing appraisal tools for those wanting to evaluate primary qualitative research for a qualitative evidence synthesis. We then discuss common features of appraisal tools and examine their implications for evidence synthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:2115 / 2131
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CHECKL QUAL RES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BMJ-BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/bmj.j80
[3]  
[Anonymous], OWN CONTR ACC POSS O
[4]  
[Anonymous], HPV TESTING PRIMARY
[5]  
[Anonymous], METAETHNOGRAPHY SYNT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HDB SYNTHESIZING QUA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GUIDELINES REPORTING
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, QUALITATIVE PSYCHOL
[9]   Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach [J].
Barbour, RS ;
Barbour, M .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 9 (02) :179-186
[10]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117