Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Brazilian Version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form Validity and Reproducibility

被引:74
作者
Metsavaht, Leonardo [1 ]
Leporace, Gustavo [1 ,2 ]
Riberto, Marcelo [3 ]
de Mello Sposito, Maria Matilde [1 ,3 ]
Batista, Luiz Alberto [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Brasil Tecnol Saude, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Lab Biomecan & Comportamento Motor, BR-20550011 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Med Fis & Reabilitacao, Hosp Lucy Montouro, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Programa Pos Grad Ciencias Med, BR-20550011 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
cross-cultural adaptation; translation; validity; Brazilian-Portuguese version; IKDC; VALIDATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546510365314
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The perception of improvement by a patient has assumed a central role in functional evaluation after a variety of knee problems. One of the instruments most used in clinical research is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form because its psychometric properties are considered to be excellent. Nonetheless, this questionnaire was originally developed for use in the English language. Therefore, to use this questionnaire in the Brazilian population, it is essential to translate and validate it. Purpose: The aim of this study was to translate the IKDC Subjective Knee Form into a Brazilian version and to test its validity and reproducibility. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The translation of the original IKDC Subjective Knee Form into a Brazilian version was accomplished in accordance with the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine guidelines and was tested in 32 patients with knee pathologic conditions to develop the first Brazilian version. To test validity and reproducibility, 117 patients with several knee complaints completed the Brazilian IKDC Subjective Knee Form, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Lysholm score. From these patients, 85 were retested within a week to achieve reproducibility. The validation was addressed by correlating the Brazilian IKDC Subjective Knee Form to the other outcome measures. The reproducibility was tested by measuring internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and agreement. Results: The Brazilian IKDC Subjective Knee Form was highly related to the physical component summary of the SF-36, the Lysholm score, and the WOMAC, and weakly related to the mental component summary of SF-36 (r=.79, .89, .85, and .51, respectively). The internal consistency was strong, with a Cronbach a value of .928 and .935 in the test and retest assessment, respectively. The test-retest reliability proved to be excellent, with a high value of the intraclass correlation coefficient (.988), as well as the agreement, demonstrated by the low differences between the means of the test and retest, and the short limit of agreement, observed in the Altman-Bland and survival-agreement plots. Conclusion: The results of this study provide evidence that the Brazilian IKDC Subjective Knee Form has psychometric properties similar to the original version. In addition, it was a reliable evaluation instrument for patients with knee-related problems.
引用
收藏
页码:1894 / 1899
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[2]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]  
Ciconelli R., 1999, Rev Bras Reumatol, V39, P143
[5]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302
[6]  
DAWSON EG, 1985, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V67A, P1153, DOI 10.2106/00004623-198567080-00002
[7]   Current challenges in clinimetrics [J].
de Vet, HCW ;
Terwee, CB ;
Bouter, LM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (12) :1137-1141
[8]  
Fernandes MI, 2003, THESIS U FEDERAL SAO
[9]  
GRECO NJ, 2009, AM J SPORTS MED 1231
[10]   CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASURES - LITERATURE-REVIEW AND PROPOSED GUIDELINES [J].
GUILLEMIN, F ;
BOMBARDIER, C ;
BEATON, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (12) :1417-1432