Perspectives and limitations of microarray-based gene expression profiling of thyroid tumors

被引:43
作者
Eszlinger, Markus
Krohn, Knut
Kukulska, Aleksandra
Jarzab, Barbara
Paschke, Ralf
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Dept Med 3, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Interdisciplinary Ctr Clin Res Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med & Endocrine Oncol, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
[4] Inst Oncol, Gliwice Branch, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1210/er.2006-0047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Microarray technology has become a powerful tool to analyze the gene expression of tens of thousands of genes simultaneously. Microarray-based gene expression profiles are available for malignant thyroid tumors (i.e., follicular thyroid carcinoma, and papillary thyroid carcinoma), and for benign thyroid tumors (such as autonomously functioning thyroid nodules and cold thyroid nodules). In general, the two main foci of microarray investigations are improved understanding of the pathophysiology/molecular etiology of thyroid neoplasia and the detection of genetic markers that could improve the differential diagnosis of thyroid tumors. Their results revealed new features, not known from one-gene studies. Simultaneously, the increasing number of microarray analyses of different thyroid pathologies raises the demand to efficiently compare the data. However, the use of different microarray platforms complicates cross-analysis. In addition, there are other important differences between these studies: 1) some studies use intraindividual comparisons, whereas other studies perform interindividual comparisons; 2) the reference tissue is defined as strictly nonnodular healthy tissue or also contains benign lesions such as goiter, follicular adenoma, and hyperplastic nodules in some studies; and 3) the widely used Affymetrix GeneChip platform comprises several GeneChip generations that are only partially compatible. Moreover, the different studies are characterized by strong differences in data analysis methods, which vary from simple empiric filters to sophisticated statistic algorithms. Therefore, this review summarizes and compares the different published reports in the context of their study design. It also illustrates perspectives and solutions for data set integration and meta-analysis, as well as the possibilities to combine array analysis with other genetic approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 338
页数:17
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]   Correlation between genetic alterations and microscopic features, clinical manifestations, and prognostic characteristics of thyroid papillary carcinomas [J].
Adeniran, AJ ;
Zhu, ZW ;
Gandhi, M ;
Steward, DL ;
Fidler, JP ;
Giordano, TJ ;
Biddinger, PW ;
Nikiforov, YE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 30 (02) :216-222
[2]   Expression of bcl-2 in papillary thyroid cancers and its prognostic value [J].
Aksoy, M ;
Giles, Y ;
Kapran, Y ;
Terzioglu, T ;
Tezelman, S .
ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2005, 105 (06) :644-648
[3]   Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas show distinctly different microarray expression profiles and can be distinguished by a minimum of five genes [J].
Aldred, MA ;
Huang, Y ;
Liyanarachchi, S ;
Pellegata, NS ;
Gimm, O ;
Jhiang, S ;
Davuluri, RV ;
de La Chapelle, A ;
Eng, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (17) :3531-3539
[4]  
Aldred MA, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P2864
[5]  
[Anonymous], ENDOCRINE TUMORS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for P-value adjustment
[7]  
Aogi K, 1998, CLIN CANCER RES, V4, P1965
[8]   PHORBOL ESTERS STIMULATE GROWTH AND INHIBIT DIFFERENTIATION IN CULTURED THYROID-CELLS [J].
BACHRACH, LK ;
EGGO, MC ;
MAK, WW ;
BURROW, GN .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1985, 116 (04) :1603-1609
[9]   Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms [J].
Bammler, T ;
Beyer, RP ;
Bhattacharya, S ;
Boorman, GA ;
Boyles, A ;
Bradford, BU ;
Bumgarner, RE ;
Bushel, PR ;
Chaturvedi, K ;
Choi, D ;
Cunningham, ML ;
Dengs, S ;
Dressman, HK ;
Fannin, RD ;
Farun, FM ;
Freedman, JH ;
Fry, RC ;
Harper, A ;
Humble, MC ;
Hurban, P ;
Kavanagh, TJ ;
Kaufmann, WK ;
Kerr, KF ;
Jing, L ;
Lapidus, JA ;
Lasarev, MR ;
Li, J ;
Li, YJ ;
Lobenhofer, EK ;
Lu, X ;
Malek, RL ;
Milton, S ;
Nagalla, SR ;
O'Malley, JP ;
Palmer, VS ;
Pattee, P ;
Paules, RS ;
Perou, CM ;
Phillips, K ;
Qin, LX ;
Qiu, Y ;
Quigley, SD ;
Rodland, M ;
Rusyn, I ;
Samson, LD ;
Schwartz, DA ;
Shi, Y ;
Shin, JL ;
Sieber, SO ;
Slifer, S .
NATURE METHODS, 2005, 2 (05) :351-356
[10]  
Barden CB, 2003, CLIN CANCER RES, V9, P1792