Genioglossal but not palatal muscle activity relates closely to pharyngeal pressure

被引:101
作者
Malhotra, A
Pillar, G
Fogel, RB
Beauregard, J
Edwards, JK
Slamowitz, DI
Shea, SA
White, DP [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med,Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med,Div Endocrinol,Sleep Disorders Sect, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Natl Jewish Hosp, Pulm & Crit Care Unit, Denver, CO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9912067
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The stimuli controlling pharyngeal dilator muscles are poorly defined. Local mechanoreceptors are a leading possibility. To address this, we assessed the relationship between two dilator muscle electromyograms (EMGs, i.e., genioglossus [GG-an inspiratory phasic muscle], tensor palatini [TP-a tonically active muscle]) and potential stimuli (i.e., epiglottic pressure [Pepi], airflow [(V) over dot], and pharyngeal resistance [Rpha]). Fifteen normal subjects were studied, during wakefulness and stable non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. The GGEMG and TPEMG were assessed during basal breathing and during inspiratory resistive loading (four loads, done in triplicate), while quantifying Pepi and choanal pressures (Pcho, Millar catheters) plus (V) over dot. There was a strong correlation between Pepi and GGEMG during wakefulness in most subjects (9 of 15 had absolute R > 0.7 [p < 0.05], group mean R = -0.62, p < 0.05). These correlations were less robust during NREM sleep (8 of 15 absolute R > 0.6 [p < 0.05], group mean R = -0.39, ns). The slope of the Pepi versus GGEMG relationship was greater during wakefulness than sleep (-0.67 versus -0.39% max/cm H2O, p < 0.05). No significant correlations were observed between TPEMG and any of the measured potential stimuli. We conclude that intrapharyngeal pressure may modulate genioglossus activity during wakefulness, with a fall in muscle responsiveness during sleep. The activity of the TP was not clearly influenced by any measured local stimulus either awake or asleep.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1062
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Akahoshi T, 1999, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V159, pA170
  • [2] Effect of inspiratory flow rate on respiratory rate in intubated ventilated patients
    Corne, S
    Gillespie, D
    Roberts, D
    Younes, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 156 (01) : 304 - 308
  • [3] Effect of ventilator flow rate on respiratory timing in normal humans
    Fernandez, R
    Mendez, M
    Younes, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (03) : 710 - 719
  • [4] Reduced genioglossal activity with upper airway anesthesia in awake patients with OSA
    Fogel, RB
    Malhotra, A
    Shea, SA
    Edwards, JK
    White, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 88 (04) : 1346 - 1354
  • [5] Effects of non-REM sleep on the response of respiratory output to varying inspiratory flow
    Georgopoulos, D
    Mitrouska, I
    Bshouty, Z
    Anthonisen, NR
    Younes, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 153 (05) : 1624 - 1630
  • [6] EVIDENCE FOR REFLEX UPPER AIRWAY DILATOR MUSCLE ACTIVATION BY SUDDEN NEGATIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE IN MAN
    HORNER, RL
    INNES, JA
    MURPHY, K
    GUZ, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1991, 436 : 15 - 29
  • [7] AFFERENT PATHWAY(S) FOR PHARYNGEAL DILATOR REFLEX TO NEGATIVE-PRESSURE IN MAN - A STUDY USING UPPER AIRWAY ANESTHESIA
    HORNER, RL
    INNES, JA
    HOLDEN, HB
    GUZ, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1991, 436 : 31 - 44
  • [8] AFFERENT PATHWAYS FOR HYPOGLOSSAL AND PHRENIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN UPPER AIRWAY PRESSURE
    HWANG, JC
    STJOHN, WM
    BARTLETT, D
    [J]. RESPIRATION PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 55 (03): : 341 - 354
  • [9] HWANG JC, 1988, RESP PHYSL, V55, P355
  • [10] Local mechanisms drive genioglossus activation in obstructive sleep apnea
    Malhotra, A
    Fogel, RB
    Edwards, JK
    Shea, SA
    White, DP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 161 (05) : 1746 - 1749