How doctors choose medications to treat type 2 diabetes - A national survey of specialists and academic generalists

被引:76
作者
Grant, Richard W.
Wexler, Deborah J.
Watson, Alice J.
Lester, William T.
Cagliero, Enrico
Campbell, Eric G.
Nathan, David M.
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Gen Med Unit, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Ctr Diabet, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Partners Telemed Program, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Comp Sci Lab, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Policy, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/dc06-2499
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE- Glycemic control remains suboptimal despite the wide range of available medications. More effective medication prescription might result in better control. However, the process by which physicians choose glucose-lowering medicines is poorly understood. We sought to study the means by which physicians choose medications for type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We surveyed 886 physician members of either the Society of General Internal Medicine (academic generalists, response rate 30%) or the American Diabetes Association (specialists, response rate 23%) currently managing patients with type 2 diabetes. Respondents weighed the importance of 15 patient, physician, and nonclinical factors when deciding which medications to prescribe for type 2 diabetic subjects at each of three management stages (initiation, use of second-line oral agents, and insulin). RESULTS - Respondents reported using a median of five major considerations (interquartile range 4-6) at each stage. Frequently cited major considerations included overall assessment of the patient's heal th/comorbidity, AlC level, and patient's adherence behavior but not expert guidelines/hospital algorithms or patient age. For insulin initiation, academic generalists placed greater emphasis on patient adherence (76 vs. 60% of specialists, P < 0.001). These generalists also identified patient fear of injections (68%) and patient desire to prolong noninsulin therapy (68%) as major insulin barriers. Overall, qualitative factors (e.g., adherence, motivation, overall health assessment) were somewhat more highly considered than quantitative factors (e.g., A I C, age, weight) with mean aggregate scores of 7.3 vs. 6.9 on a scale of 0-10, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS - The physicians in our survey considered a wide range of qualitative and quantitative factors when making medication choices for hyperglycemia management. The apparent complexity of the medication choice process contrasts with current evidence-based treatment guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1448 / 1453
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Primary and Specialty medical care among ethnically diverse, older rural adults with type 2 diabetes: The ELDER Diabetes Study
    Bell, RA
    Quandt, SA
    Arcury, TA
    Snively, BM
    Stafford, JM
    Smith, SL
    Skelly, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2005, 21 (03) : 198 - 205
  • [2] Gut-derived incretin hormones and new therapeutic approaches
    Bloomgarden, AT
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (10) : 2554 - 2559
  • [3] Utilization of oral hypoglycemic agents in a drug-insured US population
    Boccuzzi, SJ
    Wogen, J
    Fox, J
    Sung, JCY
    Shah, AB
    Kim, J
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (08) : 1411 - 1415
  • [4] Specialty differences in the care of older patients with diabetes
    Chin, MH
    Zhang, JX
    Merrell, K
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (02) : 131 - 140
  • [5] Variations in the care of elderly persons with diabetes among endocrinologists, general internists, and geriatricians
    Chin, MH
    Su, AW
    Jin, L
    Nerney, MP
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 55 (10): : M601 - M606
  • [6] Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    Chobanian, AV
    Bakris, GL
    Black, HR
    Cushman, WC
    Green, LA
    Izzo, JL
    Jones, DW
    Materson, BJ
    Oparil, S
    Wright, JT
    Roccella, EJ
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) : 1206 - 1252
  • [7] Diabetes in urban African/Americans. XV. Identification of barriers to provider adherence to management protocols
    El-Kebbi, IM
    Ziemer, DC
    Gallina, DL
    Dunbar, V
    Phillips, LS
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (10) : 1617 - 1620
  • [8] Measuring beliefs about taking hypoglycaemic medication among people with Type 2 diabetes
    Farmer, A
    Kinmonth, AL
    Sutton, S
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (03) : 265 - 270
  • [9] A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations
    Glazier, Richard H.
    Bajcar, Jana
    Kennie, Natalie R.
    Willson, Kristie
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (07) : 1675 - 1688
  • [10] Trends in complexity of diabetes care in the United States from 1991 to 2000
    Grant, RW
    Pirraglia, PA
    Meigs, JB
    Singer, DE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 164 (10) : 1134 - 1139