Secondary task engagement, risk-taking, and safety-related equipment use in German bicycle and e-scooter riders-An observation

被引:23
作者
Huemer, Anja Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Banach, Elise [1 ]
Bolten, Nicolas [1 ]
Helweg, Sarah [1 ]
Koch, Anjanette [1 ]
Martin, Tamara [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Engn & Traff Psychol, Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Engn & Traff Psychol, Gaussstr 23, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
E-scooters; Bicycles; E-bikes; Shared mobility; Secondary task; Safety equipment; Observational study; Infrastructure use; Riders? characteristics; PACED SMARTPHONE TASKS; ELECTRIC BIKE RIDERS; MOBILE PHONE USE; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; DISTRACTED BIKING; TRAFFIC SOUNDS; CYCLISTS; BEHAVIOR; DRIVERS; CRASHES;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2022.106685
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
The behavioral safety of e-bike and e-scooter riders is a significant concern in traffic safety. In an observational study in Braunschweig, Germany, 4,514 bicycle and e-scooter riders were observed concerning their used vehicles type, secondary task engagement, use of additional safety equipment, and traffic rule violation. Overall, 13.4% of all riders were engaged in any secondary task, wearing headphones or earphones being the most frequent behavior (6.7%), followed by conversations with other cyclists (3.7%). Banned mobile phone use was low (0.8%). Secondary task engagement was positively correlated with traffic rule violations and at-fault conflicts and negatively with the use of additional safety equipment. Cluster analysis on vehicle types and behaviors revealed five groups of riders, two with relatively high numbers of risky behaviors: young and middle-aged, predominantly male riders of conventional bicycles, and a group of demographically similar users of electric bikes and e-scooters. Campaigns targeted at these specific groups may help reduce risky behaviors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Adell E., 2014, P 3 INT CYCL SAF C I
[2]   Bicyclists' visual strategies when conducting self-paced vs. system-paced smartphone tasks in traffic [J].
Ahlstrom, Christer ;
Kircher, Katja ;
Thorslund, Birgitta ;
Adell, Emeli .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 41 :204-216
[3]  
Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zur Straβenverkehrs-Ordnung (VwV-StVO), 2001, ADM REGULATIONS GERM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GERM TRAFF LAW
[5]  
Arellano J.F., 2019, SUNDAY DRIVERS TOO F, DOI [10.32866/001c.11210, DOI 10.32866/001C.11210]
[6]   Dockless E-scooter usage patterns and urban built Environments: A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN [J].
Bai, Shunhua ;
Jiao, Junfeng .
TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2020, 20 :264-272
[7]  
Baier M. M., 2022, BERICHTE BUNDESANSTA
[8]   Crashes involving cyclists aged 50 and over in in-depth study the Netherlands: An in-depth study [J].
BoeleVos, M. J. ;
Van Duijvenvoorde, K. ;
Doumen, M. J. A. ;
Duivenvoorden, C. W. A. E. ;
Louwerse, W. J. R. ;
Davidse, R. J. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2017, 105 :4-10
[9]   Beyond 'good' and 'bad' cyclists. On compensation effects between risk taking, safety equipment and secondary tasks [J].
Buhler, Thomas ;
Comby, Emeline ;
Vaudor, Lise ;
von Pape, Thilo .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2021, 22
[10]   A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving [J].
Caird, Jeff K. ;
Johnston, Kate A. ;
Wiliness, Chelsea R. ;
Asbridge, Mark ;
Steel, Piers .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2014, 71 :311-318