Operation mode selection of NIMBY facility Public Private Partnership projects

被引:8
作者
Zhao, Hui [1 ]
Zhang, Jingqi [1 ]
Ge, Yuanyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ Technol, Sch Management Engn, Qingdao, Peoples R China
关键词
POLICY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0254046
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Construction of not in my back yard (NIMBY) facility Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects are feasible measures to realize sustainable urbanization. In order to ensure the smooth development of the NIMBY facility PPP projects, the problem of choosing the most suitable operation mode among many PPP modes is still scarce and unscientific. In order to select the operation mode of the PPP projects that best fits the characteristics of the project, this paper constructs the operation mode selection of the NIMBY facility PPP project. Firstly, the index system of operation mode selection of the NIMBY facility PPP project is determined. G1 subjective weighting method and information entropy objective weighting method are introduced to solve the optimal weight of each index. Grey correlation theory is used to improve TOPSIS method, and the calculation form of relative proximity degree is optimized to determine the most suitable operation mode for the project. In this paper, combined weighting and TOPSIS method are applied to the research of NIMBY facility PPP project, and the operation mode selection of NIMBY facility PPP project is established, which makes up the blank of this part. Finally, a PPP project in Qingdao, Shandong Province, China, is taken as an example to verify the applicability of the model. The effectiveness of this model was tested by comparing the results of TOPSIS method, Grey target model, Extended matter-element mode and GRA-TOPSIS. It is hoped to provide useful reference for the operation mode selection of NIMBY facility PPP project.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Implementing Fuzzy AHP and FUCOM to evaluate critical success factors for sustained academic quality assurance and ABET accreditation [J].
Ahmad, Naim ;
Qahmash, Ayman .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09)
[2]  
Ali AA., 2010, TANZANIA J FORESTRY, V80, P61, DOI [10.4314/tjfnc.v80i1, DOI 10.4314/TJFNC.V80I1]
[3]   Compensation mechanism for urban water environment treatment PPP project in China [J].
An, Xiaowei ;
Li, Huimin ;
Wang, Lunyan ;
Wang, Zhuofu ;
Ding, Jiyong ;
Cao, Yongchao .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 :246-253
[4]   Experts' perspectives on the application of public-private partnership policy in prevention of road traffic injuries [J].
Azami-Aghdash, Saber ;
Sadeghi-Bazargani, Homayoun ;
Saadati, Mohammad ;
Mohseni, Mohammad ;
Gharaee, Hojatolah .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 23 (03) :152-158
[5]  
Baksh M., 2021, DHS NOMINEE PLEDGES
[6]   The impact of COVID-19 on the European football ecosystem-A Delphi-based scenario analysis [J].
Beiderbeck, Daniel ;
Frevel, Nicolas ;
Gracht, Heiko A. von der ;
Schmidt, Sascha L. ;
Schweitzer, Vera M. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 165
[7]   NIMBY, not, in siting community wind farms [J].
Boyle, Kevin J. ;
Boatwright, Jessica ;
Brahma, Sreeya ;
Xu, Weibin .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 57 :85-100
[8]  
Chang CC., 2021, P I MECH ENG M-J ENG, V235
[9]  
Chen JW., 2017, EC FORUM, V9, P139
[10]   Overview of public-private partnerships in the waste-to-energy incineration industry in China: Status, opportunities, and challenges [J].
Cui, Caiyun ;
Liu, Yong ;
Xia, Bo ;
Jiang, Xiaoyan ;
Skitmore, Martin .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 32