Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-constrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T

被引:11
作者
Palosaari, K [1 ]
Ojala, R [1 ]
Blanco-Sequeiros, R [1 ]
Tervonen, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, FIN-90229 Oulu, Finland
关键词
cartilage; MR; knee; magnetic resonance (MR); comparative studies; low-field-strength imaging; water-fat imaging; fat suppression;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.10343
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a newly developed single-scan phase-contrast water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression at 0.23T open magnet, compared to the conventional chemical shift selective fat suppression method at 1.5T, in the detection of experimental articular cartilage lesions. Materials and Methods: Sixty regions of 20 knee joint specimens of pigs with artificially created articular cartilage lesions were examined with 0.23T and 1.5T MR scanners. Sagittal fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo (3D GRE) images, obtained with the phase-contrast method at 0.23T, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled echo (3D SPGR) images, obtained with a chemical shift selective method at 1.5T, were evaluated. Diagnostic performance was analyzed. The conspicuity of the lesions, the amount of artifacts, and the uniformity of fat suppression were evaluated. The contrast-to-noise (CNR) values of cartilage-to-bone marrow, and cartilage-to-infrapatellar fat were calculated. Results: At 0.23T, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 95% for partial cartilage lesions (grade 2), and 91% and 100% for full-thickness lesions (grade 3). At 1.5T, sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 95% for grade 2 lesions, and 96% and 97% for grade 3 lesions. No significant difference was detected in the conspicuity of lesions. The uniformity of fat suppression was more constant with 3D SPGR images compared to 3D GRE images. More susceptibility artifacts. derived from the procedure of creating lesions, were detected at 1.5T. The cartilage-to-fat CNRs were significantly higher with high-field images. Conclusion: Phase-contrast method for fat suppression at 0.23T is a useful technique in detecting articular cartilage lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 231
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
AHN C B, 1986, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, V4, P110, DOI 10.1016/0730-725X(86)90921-5
[2]   Evaluation of patellar cartilage in cadavers with a low-field-strength extremity-only magnet: Comparison of MR imaging sequences, with macroscopic findings as the standard [J].
Ahn, JM ;
Kwak, SM ;
Kang, HS ;
Muhle, C ;
Pedowitz, PA ;
Frank, LR ;
Trudell, D ;
Haghighi, P ;
Resnick, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 208 (01) :57-62
[3]   Three-point Dixon chemical-shift imaging for evaluating articular cartilage defects in the knee joint on a low-field-strength open magnet [J].
Bredella, MA ;
Losasso, C ;
Moelleken, SC ;
Huegli, RW ;
Genant, HK ;
Tirman, PFJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (06) :1371-1375
[4]   Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: Comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients [J].
Bredella, MA ;
Tirman, PFJ ;
Peterfy, CG ;
Zarlingo, M ;
Feller, JF ;
Bost, FW ;
Belzer, JP ;
Wischer, TK ;
Genant, HK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (04) :1073-1080
[5]   MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T:: Correlation with surgery [J].
Cotten, A ;
Delfaut, E ;
Demondion, X ;
Lapègue, F ;
Boukhelifa, M ;
Boutry, N ;
Chastanet, P ;
Gougeon, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (04) :1093-1097
[6]   DETECTION OF KNEE HYALINE CARTILAGE DEFECTS USING FAT-SUPPRESSED 3-DIMENSIONAL SPOILED GRADIENT-ECHO MR-IMAGING - COMPARISON WITH STANDARD MR-IMAGING AND CORRELATION WITH ARTHROSCOPY [J].
DISLER, DG ;
MCCAULEY, TR ;
WIRTH, CR ;
FUCHS, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (02) :377-382
[7]   Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: Comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy [J].
Disler, DG ;
McCauley, TR ;
Kelman, CG ;
Fuchs, MD ;
Ratner, LM ;
Wirth, CR ;
Hospodar, PP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (01) :127-132
[8]   SIMPLE PROTON SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING [J].
DIXON, WT .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 153 (01) :189-194
[9]   MULTIPOINT DIXON TECHNIQUE FOR WATER AND FAT PROTON AND SUSCEPTIBILITY IMAGING [J].
GLOVER, GH .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1991, 1 (05) :521-530
[10]   SEPARATION OF FAT AND WATER IN FAST SPIN-ECHO MR-IMAGING WITH THE 3-POINT DIXON TECHNIQUE [J].
HARDY, PA ;
HINKS, RS ;
TKACH, JA .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (02) :181-185