Closure of small bowel stomas on postoperative day 10

被引:44
作者
Menegaux, F [1 ]
Jordi-Galais, P [1 ]
Turrin, N [1 ]
Chigot, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Gen & Digest Surg, Paris, France
关键词
surgical procedure; stoma; jejunostomy; ileostomy; colorectal surgery; peritonitis; mesenteric ischemia; postoperative complications;
D O I
10.1080/00000000000000008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To find out if early closure of a defunctioning small bowel stoma (day 10) was feasible and safe. Design: Prospective non-randomised study. Setting: University hospital, France. Interventions: During a 42-month period (January 1998-June 2001), all patients with a temporary small bowel stoma were elected for early closure on postoperative day 10 in a non-randomised prospective study. The procedure was considered only if the patient was not taking steroids, was in good condition, and had not developed wound or general sepsis after the initial operation. Other patients' stomas were closed after the usually recommended delay (>8 weeks). Main outcome measures: Postoperative complications, delay to recover bowel activity, and to resume oral feeding, and duration of hospital stay. Results: Thirty-six patients were included in the study: 14 patients in the early group and 22 in the delayed group. There were no postoperative deaths. Three patients developed wound abscesses, two in the early group and one in the delayed group. The median (range) duration of hospital stay was longer in the delayed group: 36 (14-84) days, than in the early group: 22 (18-29) days (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Small bowel stomas can be closed in selected healthy patients on postoperative day 10 without major complications.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 715
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Edwards, DP
    Leppington-Clarke, A
    Sexton, R
    Heald, RJ
    Moran, BJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (03) : 360 - 363
  • [2] Gooszen AW, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P76
  • [3] Quality of life with a temporary stoma -: Ileostomy vs. colostomy
    Gooszen, AW
    Geelkerken, RH
    Hermans, J
    Lagaay, MB
    Gooszen, HG
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (05) : 650 - 655
  • [4] Surgical strategies - anastomosis or stoma, second look - when and why?
    Hanisch, E
    Schmandra, TC
    Encke, A
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 384 (03) : 239 - 242
  • [5] Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy - A randomized controlled trial
    Hasegawa, H
    Radley, S
    Morton, DG
    Keighley, MRB
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (02) : 202 - 204
  • [6] Quality of life in stoma patients
    Nugent, KP
    Daniels, P
    Stewart, B
    Patankar, R
    Johnson, CD
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (12) : 1569 - 1574
  • [7] Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown
    Phang, PT
    Hain, JM
    Perez-Ramirez, JJ
    Madoff, RD
    Gemio, BT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (06) : 463 - 466
  • [8] Surgical management and treatment of sepsis associated with gastrointestinal fistulas
    Rolandelli, R
    Roslyn, JJ
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 76 (05) : 1111 - &
  • [9] Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion - A case-matched study
    Sakai, Y
    Nelson, H
    Larson, D
    Maidl, L
    Young-Fadok, T
    Ilstrup, D
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (03) : 338 - 342
  • [10] LOOP ILEOSTOMY IS A SAFE OPTION FOR FECAL DIVERSION
    WEXNER, SD
    TARANOW, DA
    JOHANSEN, OB
    ITZKOWITZ, F
    DANIEL, N
    NOGUERAS, JJ
    JAGELMAN, DG
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1993, 36 (04) : 349 - 354