Prototype testing for the partial removal and re-penetration of the mooring dolphin platform with multi-bucket foundations

被引:16
作者
Le Conghuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ding Hongyan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zhang Puyang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat & Safety, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Coast Civil Struct Safety, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-bucket foundations; Shear strength factor; Mooring dolphin platform; Removal; Prototype testing; SUCTION CAISSONS; MODEL TESTS; CAPACITY; SAND; INSTALLATION; CLAY; ANCHORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.12.008
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The partial removal, adjusting, and re-penetrating tests were carried out on a mooring dolphin platform with three-bucket foundations after a seven-year service. When the bucket foundations were penetrated by internal and external pressure differential, the soil shear strength around the bucket skirt was different from that of the intact soil after installation. The side shear strength along the skirt may be increased with time due to the set-up effect. The shear strength factor a is an important time-varying factor to determine the skin friction of the foundation during installation and removal operations. The shear strength factors obtained by prototype records and theoretical methods in cohesive soils are compared, from total stress to effective stress methods. In addition, the prototype tests show that the foundations will be able to resist removal forces that are significantly larger than penetration forces due to the set-up effect after a long working time. The results show an 85% increase in the soil resistance after seven years for the three-bucket foundations with diameters of 6 m and penetration depths of 8.5 m. Meanwhile, the construction procedure and operation of the three-bucket foundations and the analysis of the extraction forces are also given for the partial removal. The test results support the successful removal by a reasonable overpressure without soil plug failure inside the buckets by controlling the pump discharge inside the buckets and reutilizing the structure with multi-bucket foundations after an initial service period of seven years.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 93
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Model tests on installation techniques of suction caissons in a soft clay seabed [J].
Guo, Zhen ;
Wang, Lizhong ;
Yuan, Feng ;
Li, Lingling .
APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2012, 34 :116-125
[22]   Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials [J].
Houlsby, GT ;
Byrne, BW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 158 (02) :75-82
[23]  
Jeanjean P., 2006, OFFSH TECHN C OTC HO
[24]  
Jostad H. P., 2004, OFFSH TECHN C OCT HO
[25]  
Karlsrud K., 2005, P INT S FRONTIERS OF, P775
[26]  
Kolk H.J., 1996, P OFFSH TECHN C HOUS, V2
[27]   Air-floating towing behaviors of multi-bucket foundation platform [J].
Le Cong-huan ;
Ding Hong-yan ;
Zhang Pu-yang .
CHINA OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2013, 27 (05) :645-658
[28]   Capacity of modified suction caissons in marine sand under static horizontal loading [J].
Li, Dayong ;
Zhang, Yukun ;
Feng, Lingyun ;
Gao, Yufeng .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2015, 102 :1-16
[29]  
Liu R., 2014, J RENEW SUSTAIN ENER, V7
[30]   Components of suction caisson capacity measured in axial pullout tests [J].
Luke, AM ;
Rauch, AF ;
Olson, RE ;
Mecham, EC .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2005, 32 (07) :878-891