Sequential administration of 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11) at relapse versus CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma - A phase III randomized study

被引:10
作者
Tsavaris, Nicolas [1 ]
Kosmas, Christos
Skopelitis, Helias
Papadoniou, Nicitas
Polyzos, Aristidis
Zografos, George
Adoniou, Efstathios
Gryniatsos, John
Felekouras, Evangelos
Zacharakis, Michalis
Sigala, Francheska
Bacoyiannis, Christos
Papastratis, George
Papalambros, Efstathios
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Laikon Gen Hosp, Dept Pathophysiol, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[2] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Laikon Gen Hosp, Oncol Unit, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[3] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Laikon Gen Hosp, Dept Propedeut Med, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[4] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Laikon Gen Hosp, Dept Surg 2, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[5] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Laikon Gen Hosp, Dept Surg 1, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[6] G Gennimatas Gen Hosp, Dept Surg 3, Athens, Greece
[7] Gen Hosp Rhodes, Dept Gastroenterol, Rhodes, Greece
[8] Metaxa Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol 2, Piraeus, Greece
关键词
colorectal cancer; 5-fluorouracil; irinotecan; leucovorin;
D O I
10.1159/000102583
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the differences in the sequence of administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11), or CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with ACC were allocated to the following treatment groups: group A, a bolus of 20 mg/m(2) LV and 425 mg/m(2) 5-FU for 5 days until progression/relapse, and upon progression treatment with weekly CPT-11 (100 mg/m(2)), and group B, CPT-11 followed at progression/relapse by 5-FU/LV at the same doses and schedules as in group A. Results: 120 patients were randomized to receive one of the two treatment sequences and their pretreatment characteristics were equally balanced between treatment arms. No statistically significant difference was found in the objective response rate to CPT-11 (p = 0.45); partial response (PR) was 23.3% for group A patients and 33.3% for group B. Following documented progression and second line treatment there was a significant difference between the response rate in group A (23.3%) and group B where no patients were found to respond to second-line treatment with 5-FU/LV (p = 0.024). The median overall survival was 42.0 weeks (range, 36.6-47.4 weeks) for group A and 32.0 weeks (range, 28.2-35.8 weeks) for group B. The median time to progression for patients in group A following first-line 5-FU/LV was 18 weeks (range, 10-36 weeks) and 12 weeks (range, 10-16 weeks) for group B following first-line CPT-11 (p = 0.0005). Toxicity, according to WHO, was similar between groups. Conclusions: Treating patients with CPT-11 upon progression to 5-FU/LV treatment seems to be superior to the opposite sequence. We used these treatments as sequential monotherapies (at progression/relapse), and the best results are gained when 5-FU/LV is followed by CPT-11 at disease progression or relapse. Copyright (C) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 291
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*ADV COL CANC MET, 2002, J CLIN ONCOL, V10, P896
[2]   CPT-II (IRINOTECAN) IN THE TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
ARMAND, JP ;
DUCREUX, M ;
MAHJOUBI, M ;
ABIGERGES, D ;
BUGAT, R ;
CHABOT, G ;
HERAIT, P ;
DEFORNI, M ;
ROUGIER, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (7-8) :1283-1287
[3]   A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan in combination with infusional or two different bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid regimens as flrst-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Bouzid, K ;
Khalfallah, S ;
Tujakowski, J ;
Piko, B ;
Purkalne, G ;
Plate, S ;
Padrik, P ;
Serafy, M ;
Pshevloutsky, EM ;
Boussard, B .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (07) :1106-1114
[4]   Phase II study of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) as second-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Cassinello, J ;
López-Alvarez, P ;
Martínez-Guisado, A ;
Valladares, M ;
Huidobro, G ;
López, R ;
Bohn, U ;
Sevilla, I ;
Ballesteros, P ;
Jorge, M ;
Pérez-Carrión, R ;
Fernández, JL ;
Dorta, J .
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 20 (01) :37-43
[5]   Irinotecan is an active agent in untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Conti, JA ;
Kemeny, NE ;
Saltz, LB ;
Huang, Y ;
Tong, WP ;
Chou, TC ;
Sun, M ;
Pulliam, S ;
Gonzalez, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (03) :709-715
[6]   Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Cunningham, D ;
Pyrhönen, S ;
James, RD ;
Punt, CJA ;
Hickish, TF ;
Heikkila, R ;
Johannesen, TB ;
Starkhammar, H ;
Topham, CA ;
Awad, L ;
Jacques, C ;
Herait, P .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9138) :1413-1418
[7]   Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial [J].
Douillard, JY ;
Cunningham, D ;
Roth, AD ;
Navarro, M ;
James, RD ;
Karasek, P ;
Jandik, P ;
Iveson, T ;
Carmichael, J ;
Alakl, M ;
Gruia, G ;
Awad, L ;
Rougier, P .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9209) :1041-1047
[8]   Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen):: A clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Ducreux, M ;
Ychou, M ;
Seitz, JF ;
Bonnay, M ;
Bexon, A ;
Armand, JP ;
Mahjoubi, M ;
Méry-Mignard, D ;
Rougier, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2901-2908
[9]  
Firvida JL, 2001, CANCER, V91, P704
[10]  
Garufi G, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P712