Effect of supplemental phytase on growth, phosphorus digestibility and bone mineralization of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L)

被引:49
作者
Nwanna, Lawrence C.
Schwarz, Frieder J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Technol Akure, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Akure, Nigeria
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Anim Sci, Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
phytase; common carp; growth; P digestibility; plasma P;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01752.x
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The effect of dietary phytase on phosphorus (P) digestibility, growth, bone mineralization and plasma P of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) was investigated. Five diets, D0, DP, PHYT1, PHYT2 and PHYT4, were used. D0 contained no supplement. DP was supplemented with 2.6 g P (Na2HPO4 x 2H(2)O) kg(-1). PHYT1, PHYT2 and PHYT4 comprised 1000, 2000 and 4000 U phytase [Ronozyme P (CT)] kg(-1). D0, PHYT1, PHYT2, PHYT4 had average of 7.95 g P kg(-1); DP contained 10.3 g P kg(-1). After 126 days of feeding, fish grew from 115 to 347 g (D0), 583.7 g (DP), 352.6 g (PHYT1), 393.3 g (PHYT2) and 406.4 g (PHYT4). Addition of phytase significantly increased daily feed intake, but only led to a marginal improvement in the weight gain, SGR and FCR of fish fed PHYT2 and PHYT4 compared with fish fed D0. Fish fed DP showed the best (P < 0.05) growth performances. Fish fed DP and PHYT4 significantly digested dietary P more than the fish fed D0. Fish fed D0, PHYT1, PHYT2 and PHYT4 retained higher (P < 0.05) Zn in their bones than fish fed DP. However, there was no further effect on bone mineralization. Plasma P scarcely improved by between 14% and 26% in fish fed PHYT2 and PHYT4 relative to fish fed D0. P concentration of the faeces was reduced by about 9-22% in fish fed PHYT1 and PHYT4 compared with fish fed D0.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1044
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
*AOAC, 1990, OFF METH AN
[2]  
Augspurger NR, 2004, J ANIM SCI, V82, P1732
[3]  
Baruah K., 2004, NAGA WORLDFISH CTR Q, V27, P15
[4]   ADDITIVE EFFECT OF CALCIUM AND PHOSPHORUS ON UTILIZATION OF DIETARY ZINC [J].
CABELL, CA ;
EARLE, IP .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1965, 24 (03) :800-&
[5]  
CAIN KD, 1995, PROG FISH CULT, V57, P114, DOI 10.1577/1548-8640(1995)057&lt
[6]  
0114:POSMWP&gt
[7]  
2.3.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
DABROWSKA H, 1977, AQUACULTURE, V10, P297, DOI 10.1016/0044-8486(77)90120-X
[10]  
DUNCAN DB, 1955, BIOMETRICS, V11, P42