Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067

被引:6
作者
Baker, Timothy [1 ]
Johnson, Helen [2 ]
Kotapati, Srividya [3 ]
Moshyk, Andriy [3 ]
Hamilton, Melissa [3 ]
Kurt, Murat [3 ]
Paly, Victoria Federico [4 ]
机构
[1] ICON Plc, ICON Clin Res, Global Hlth Econ Outcomes Res & Epidemiol, 4131 Parklake Ave,Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27612 USA
[2] Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] ICON Plc, ICON Clin Res, Global Hlth Econ Outcomes Res & Epidemiol, 731Arbor Way,Suite 100, Blue Bell, PA 19422 USA
关键词
HEALTH STATES; COMBINATION; MONOTHERAPY; VEMURAFENIB; COBIMETINIB; THERAPY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1007/s41669-022-00348-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) versus other first-line therapies for advanced melanoma in the United States (US) from the third-party payer perspective. Methods This analysis estimated total expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and costs for first-line treatments of advanced melanoma during a 30-year time horizon using indirect treatment comparisons based on time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) and a three-state partitioned survival model. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival reference curves were extrapolated based on 5-year follow-up from the phase III Checkmate 067 trial (NCT01844505). Comparators of NIVO + IPI were NIVO, IPI, pembrolizumab, dabrafenib plus trametinib, encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Drug acquisition costs, treatment administration costs, follow-up time, subsequent therapy data, and adverse event frequencies were obtained from published sources. Utility weights were estimated from Checkmate 067, which compared NIVO + IPI or NIVO monotherapy with IPI monotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced melanoma. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Sensitivity scenarios for BRAF-mutant subgroups were conducted. Results NIVO + IPI was estimated to generate the longest OS and the highest total costs versus all comparators, accruing 6.99 LYs, 5.70 QALYs, and $469,469 over the 30-year time horizon. The incremental cost utility of NIVO + IPI versus comparators ranged from $2130 per QALY (versus ENCO + BINI) to $76,169 per QALY (versus NIVO). In all base-case and most sensitivity analyses, the incremental cost-utility ratios for NIVO + IPI were below $100,000 per QALY. Conclusions NIVO + IPI is estimated to be a life-extending and cost-effective treatment versus other therapies in the US, with base-case incremental cost-utility ratios below $100,000 per QALY.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 710
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society. Cancer Statistics Center, MEL SKIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, NCCN MAK NO WARR AN
[3]  
Arias Elizabeth, 2019, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V68, P1
[4]   Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial [J].
Ascierto, Paolo A. ;
McArthur, Grant A. ;
Dreno, Brigitte ;
Atkinson, Victoria ;
Liszkay, Gabrielle ;
Di Giacomo, Anna Maria ;
Mandala, Mario ;
Demidov, Lev ;
Stroyakovskiy, Daniil ;
Thomas, Luc ;
de la Cruz-Merino, Luis ;
Dutriaux, Caroline ;
Garbe, Claus ;
Yan, Yibing ;
Wongchenko, Matthew ;
Chang, Ilsung ;
Hsu, Jessie J. ;
Koralek, Daniel O. ;
Rooney, Isabelle ;
Ribas, Antoni ;
Larkin, James .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (09) :1248-1260
[5]   Societal preference values for advanced melanoma health states in the United Kingdom and Australia [J].
Beusterien, K. M. ;
Szabo, S. M. ;
Kotapati, S. ;
Mukherjee, J. ;
Hoos, A. ;
Hersey, P. ;
Middleton, M. R. ;
Levy, A. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (03) :387-389
[6]   Real-world treatment practice in patients with advanced melanoma [J].
Cybulska-Stopa, Bozena ;
Piejko, Karolina ;
Pacholczak, Renata ;
Domagata-Haduch, Malgorzata ;
Drosik-Kwasniewska, Anna ;
Rolski, Janusz ;
Wiktor-Mucha, Patrycja ;
Zemetka, Tomasz .
WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 24 (02) :118-124
[7]   Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial [J].
Dummer, Reinhard ;
Ascierto, Paolo A. ;
Gogas, Helen J. ;
Arance, Ana ;
Mandala, Mario ;
Liszkay, Gabriella ;
Garbe, Claus ;
Schadendorf, Dirk ;
Krajsova, Ivana ;
Gutzmer, Ralf ;
Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna ;
Dutriaux, Caroline ;
de Groot, Jan Willem B. ;
Yamazaki, Naoya ;
Loquai, Carmen ;
Moutouh-de Parseval, Laure A. ;
Pickard, Michael D. ;
Sandor, Victor ;
Robert, Caroline ;
Flaherty, Keith T. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (05) :603-615
[8]   Transferability of Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Advanced Melanoma [J].
Gorry, Claire ;
McCullagh, Laura ;
Barry, Michael .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (02) :217-231
[9]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NIVOLUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH IPILIMUMAB IN FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED MELANOMA IN THREE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES USING 28-MONTH OVERALL SURVIVAL FROM CHECKMATE 067 [J].
Hirst, A. ;
Paly, V. F. ;
Diamantogiannis, F. ;
Guilmet, C. ;
Polanco, S. C. ;
Sabater, J. ;
Chirita, O. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) :A432-A432
[10]   Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial [J].
Hodi, F. Stephen ;
Chesney, Jason ;
Pavlick, Anna C. ;
Robert, Caroline ;
Grossmann, Kenneth F. ;
McDermott, David F. ;
Linette, Gerald P. ;
Meyer, Nicolas ;
Giguere, Jeff Rey K. ;
Agarwala, Sanjiv S. ;
Shaheen, Montaser ;
Ernstoff, Marc S. ;
Minor, David R. ;
Salama, April K. ;
Taylor, Matthew H. ;
Ott, Patrick A. ;
Horak, Christine ;
Gagnier, Paul ;
Jiang, Joel ;
Wolchok, Jedd D. ;
Postow, Michael A. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (11) :1558-1568