共 50 条
Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir in liver transplant patients: a nationwide Korean registry study
被引:4
|作者:
Lee, Juhan
[1
]
Lee, Jae Geun
[1
]
Hwang, Shin
[2
]
Lee, Kwang-Woong
[3
]
Kim, Jong Man
[4
]
Ryu, Je Ho
[5
]
Kim, Bong-Wan
[6
]
Choi, Dong Lak
[7
]
You, Young Kyoung
[8
]
Kim, Dong-Sik
[9
]
Nah, Yang Won
[10
]
Kang, Koo Jeong
[11
]
Cho, Jai Young
[12
]
Yu, Hee Chul
[13
]
Hong, Geun
[14
]
Choi, Dongho
[15
]
Moon, Ju Ik
[16
]
Kim, Myoung Soo
[1
]
机构:
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Med, Div Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg & Liver Transplan, Dept Surg,Yangsan Hosp, Yangsan, South Korea
[6] Ajou Univ, Dept Liver Transplantat & Hepatobiliary Surg, Sch Med, Suwon, South Korea
[7] Catholic Univ Daegu, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Daegu, South Korea
[8] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Korea Univ, Dept Surg, Div HBP Surg & Liver Transplantat, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[10] Univ Ulsan, Ulsan Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Ulsan, South Korea
[11] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
[12] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[13] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Surg, Med Sch, Jeonju, South Korea
[14] Ewha Womans Univ, Mokdong Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[15] Hanyang Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[16] Konyang Univ, Konyang Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词:
Liver transplantation;
Hepatitis B virus;
Entecavir;
Tenofovir;
Renal dysfunction;
CHRONIC HEPATITIS-B;
HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS;
METAANALYSIS;
NUCLEOSIDE;
FAILURE;
D O I:
10.1007/s12072-022-10320-z
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background and aims Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) have been recommended after liver transplantation to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus infection. Despite its proven efficacy, the renal safety of TDF has not been established in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the effects of TDF and ETV on renal function in liver transplant recipients and to evaluate risk factors for renal dysfunction after liver transplantation. Methods This is a retrospective, observational multicenter study of data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry. We included adults who underwent liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related complications from April 2014 to December 2017 and received TDF or ETV post-transplantation. Renal dysfunction was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate decline by at least 20% from baseline (1 month post-transplantation). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (interquartile range 19-42). Results A total of 804 liver transplant patients were included. The cumulative probability of renal dysfunction was significantly higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group. Multivariable analysis confirmed that TDF was independently associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.92; p = 0.005). Independent risk factors for renal dysfunction included older age, worse baseline renal function, and low body mass index. Overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with renal dysfunction than in those without. Conclusions In this nationwide study, the use of TDF was associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction, when compared with ETV.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 544
页数:8
相关论文