Twice daily cefazolin is effective for treatment of serious methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program

被引:6
|
作者
Birrell, Michael T. [1 ]
Fuller, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hlth, Dept Infect Dis, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
antimicrobial stewardship; cefazolin; OPAT; sepsis; Staphylococcus aureus; ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY; ENDOCARDITIS; BACTEREMIA; OPAT; HOME; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; NAFCILLIN;
D O I
10.1177/2049936119882847
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: The use of cefazolin for infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus has been demonstrated to be effective, and associated with fewer adverse effects compared with anti-staphylocccal penicillins; however, use of cefazolin on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programs often requires the use of continuous infusions. We report the outcomes of patients with serious infections caused by methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) treated using twice daily cefazolin by a large tertiary hospital OPAT program. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and outcomes after 90 days of follow up for patients with serious infections caused by MSSA treated with twice daily cefazolin by our OPAT program. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes of cases treated for a serious infection proven to be caused by MSSA treated with cefazolin monotherapy on the OPAT program at a tertiary hospital between January 2010 and July 2016 (6.5 years). Outcome measures included readmission rate, adverse drug reactions and clinical cure. Results: A total of 111 cases of serious MSSA infection were treated with cefazolin in the OPAT service during the study period, including 52 with peripheral or vertebral osteomyelitis and 13 with infective endocarditis; 56 patients had bacteraemia. Median duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy was 41 days, and the median proportion of intravenous therapy administered via OPAT was 69%. Two patients had recurrence of infection within 90 days, but were in the setting of retained prosthetic material. A total of 4% of patients experienced an adverse drug reaction. No cases of antibiotic failure were identified. Conclusions: The use of twice daily cefazolin for serious MSSA infection on an OPAT program is safe and effective. Further study is needed to assess for noninferiority to conventional treatment regimes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for infections with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
    Wynn, M
    Dalovisio, JR
    Tice, AD
    Jiang, XZ
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 98 (06) : 590 - 595
  • [2] Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: a comparison of cefazolin and ceftriaxone
    S. A. Winans
    A. M. Luce
    R. Hasbun
    Infection, 2013, 41 : 769 - 774
  • [3] Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: a comparison of cefazolin and ceftriaxone
    Winans, S. A.
    Luce, A. M.
    Hasbun, R.
    INFECTION, 2013, 41 (04) : 769 - 774
  • [4] Metastatic Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Infection
    Gharwan, Helen
    Dutta, Anand
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 104 (05) : 355 - 357
  • [5] Glomerulonephritis induced by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection
    Tomohiro Handa
    Takahiko Ono
    Hitomi Watanabe
    Toshiya Takeda
    Eri Muso
    Toru Kita
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2003, 7 (3): : 247 - 249
  • [6] Cefazolin versus Nafcillin for Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in a California Tertiary Medical Center
    Pollett, S.
    Baxi, S. M.
    Rutherford, G. W.
    Doernberg, S. B.
    Bacchetti, P.
    Chambers, H. F.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 60 (08) : 4684 - 4689
  • [7] Meeting the Challenges of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy
    Tice, Alan D.
    Rehm, Susan J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 51 : S171 - S175
  • [8] The Cost-effectiveness of Cefazolin Compared With Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
    Pliakos, Elina Eleftheria
    Ziakas, Panayiotis D.
    Mylonakis, Eleftherios
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 8 (11):
  • [9] Population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in critically ill children infected with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
    Salvador, E.
    Oualha, M.
    Bille, E.
    Beranger, A.
    Moulin, F.
    Benaboud, S.
    Boujaafar, S.
    Gana, I
    Urien, S.
    Zheng, Y.
    Toubiana, J.
    Briand, C.
    Bustarret, O.
    Geslain, G.
    Renolleau, S.
    Treluyer, J-M
    Hirt, D.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (03) : 413 - 419
  • [10] Population pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in critically ill children infected with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
    Salvador, E.
    Oualha, M.
    Bille, E.
    Beranger, A.
    Moulin, F.
    Benaboud, S.
    Boujaafar, S.
    Gana, I.
    Urien, S.
    Zheng, Y.
    Toubania, J.
    Briand, C.
    Bustarret, O.
    Geslain, G.
    Renolleau, S.
    Treluyer, J. M.
    Hirt, D.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 35 : 81 - 81