Comparison of coal IGCC with and without CO2 capture and storage: Shell gasification with standard vs. partial water quench

被引:72
作者
Martelli, Emanuele [1 ]
Kreutz, Thomas
Consonni, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, I-20133 Milan, Italy
来源
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9 | 2009年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
coal IGCC; CO2 capture and storage; CCS; dry feed; Shell gasification; partial water quench; modeling; economics; COMMERCIALLY READY TECHNOLOGY; COPRODUCTION; ELECTRICITY; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.080
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This work provides a techno-economic assessment of Shell coal gasification-based IGCC, with and without CO2 capture and storage (CCS), focusing on the comparison between the standard Shell configuration with dry gas quench and syngas coolers versus partial water quench cooling. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 614
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   CO2 absorption with membrane contactors vs. packed absorbers-Challenges and opportunities in post combustion capture and natural gas sweetening [J].
Hoff, Karl Anders ;
Svendsen, Hallvard F. .
GHGT-11, 2013, 37 :952-960
[42]   A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage -: Part B:: Chain analysis of promising CCS options [J].
Damen, Kay ;
van Troost, Martijn ;
Faaij, Andre ;
Turkenburg, Wim .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2007, 33 (06) :580-609
[43]   Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill - Part II: Economic feasibility in comparison with conventional blast furnace highlighting sensitivities [J].
Tsupari, Eemeli ;
Kaerki, Janne ;
Arasto, Antti ;
Lilja, Jarmo ;
Kinnunen, Kimmo ;
Sihvonen, Miika .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 32 :189-196
[44]   Techno-economic and environmental comparison of carbon capture for standalone retrofitting and CO2 hubs in a coal-fueled power complex [J].
Julio, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano ;
Palacio, Jose Carlos Escobar ;
Orozco, Dimas Jose Rua .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 315
[45]   Comparison of Long-Term Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage to Reference Power Generation Technologies Using CO2 Avoidance Cost in the US [J].
Kasturi, Abishek ;
Yiacoumi, Sotira ;
Langholtz, Matthew ;
McFarlane, Joanna ;
Busch, Ingrid ;
Hilliard, Michael ;
Tsouris, Costas .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (21)
[46]   Coal-fuelled systems for peaking power with 100% CO2 capture through integration of solid oxide fuel cells with compressed air energy storage [J].
Nease, Jake ;
Adams, Thomas A., II .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2014, 251 :92-107
[47]   CFD comparison of water based SiO2 nanofluid with benchmark MEA amine solution for CO2 capture through porous membrane contactor [J].
Hadil Faris Alotaibi ;
Ahmed Mohsen ;
Bhavesh Kanabar ;
Abhinav Kumar ;
Nagaraj Patil ;
Debasish Shit ;
V. K. Bupesh Raja ;
Dhirendra Nath Thatoi ;
Deepak Gupta .
Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
[48]   Post-combustion CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants: comparison of integrated chemical absorption processes with piperazine promoted potassium carbonate and MEA [J].
Oexmann, Jochen ;
Kather, Alfons .
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01) :799-806
[49]   Protonation and structural/chemical stability of Ln2NiO4+δ ceramics vs. H2O/CO2: High temperature/water pressure ageing tests [J].
Upasen, S. ;
Batocchi, P. ;
Mauvy, F. ;
Slodczyk, A. ;
Colomban, Ph. .
JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS, 2015, 622 :1074-1085
[50]   Comparison between conventional solvothermal and aqueous solution-based production of UiO-66-NH2: Life cycle assessment, techno-economic assessment, and implications for CO2 capture and storage [J].
Luo, Hongxi ;
Cheng, Fangwei ;
Huelsenbeck, Luke ;
Smith, Natalie .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (01)