共 19 条
The Economic Impact of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in High-Risk Abdominal Incisions: A Cost-Utility Analysis
被引:48
作者:
Chopra, Karan
Gowda, Arvind U.
Morrow, Chris
Holton, Luther, III
Singh, Devinder P.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Anne Arundel Med Ctr, Div Plast Surg, 2001 Med Pkwy, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA
关键词:
SURGICAL-SITE INFECTIONS;
VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR;
WOUND THERAPY;
FINANCIAL IMPACT;
SYNTHETIC MESH;
MANAGEMENT;
SURGERY;
METAANALYSIS;
DRESSINGS;
SYSTEM;
D O I:
10.1097/PRS.0000000000002024
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction is beset by postoperative complications. A recent meta-analysis comparing the use of closed-incision negative-pressure therapy to standard dressings found a statistically significant reduction in surgical-site infection. The use of closed-incision negative-pressure therapy is gaining acceptance in this population; however, the economic impact of this innovative dressing remains unknown. In this study, a cost-utility analysis was performed assessing closed-incision negative-pressure therapy and standard dressings following closure of abdominal incisions in high-risk patients. Methods: Cost-utility methodology involved reviewing literature related to closed-incision negative-pressure therapy in abdominal wall surgery, obtaining utility estimates to calculate quality-adjusted life-year scores for successful surgery and surgery complicated by surgical-site infection, summing costs using Medicare Current Procedural Terminology codes, and creating a decision tree illuminating the most cost-effective dressing strategy. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the results. Results: The aforementioned meta-analysis comparing closed-incision negative-pressure therapy to standard dressings included a subset of five studies assessing abdominal wall surgery in 829 patients (260 closed-incision negative-pressure therapy and 569 standard dressings). Decision tree analysis revealed an estimated savings of $1546.52 and a gain of 0.0024 quality-adjusted life-year with closed-incision negative-pressure therapy compared with standard dressings; therefore, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy is a dominant treatment strategy. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that closed-incision negative-pressure therapy is a cost-effective option when the surgical-site infection rate is greater than 16.39 percent. Conclusion: The use of closed-incision negative-pressure therapy is cost-saving following closure of abdominal incisions in high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1284 / 1289
页数:6
相关论文