Morbidity of salvage radical prostatectomy: limited impact of the minimally invasive approach

被引:4
作者
Perera, Marlon [1 ]
Vilaseca, Antoni [1 ,2 ]
Tin, Amy L. [3 ]
Nguyen, Daniel P. [1 ,4 ]
Corradi, Renato B. [1 ]
Touijer, Adam S. [1 ]
Martin-Malburet, Alexandre Godefroy [1 ,4 ]
Alvim, Ricardo [1 ]
Benfante, Nicole [3 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel D. [3 ]
Laudone, Vincent [1 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [1 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
Touijer, Karim A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Urol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Reseau Hosp Neuchatelois, Urol Dept, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Salvage therapy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Postoperative complications; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; CANCER; RADIATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04031-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to report the morbidity profile of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) after radiotherapy failure and assess the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on postoperative complications and functional outcomes. Materials and methods Between 1985 and 2019, a total of 293 patients underwent SRP; 232 underwent open SRP; and 61 underwent laparoscopic SRP with or without robotic assistance. Complications were recorded and classified into standardized categories per the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results Twenty-nine patients (10%) experienced grade 3 complications within 30 days, 22 (9.5%) after open and 7 (11%) after MIS (p = 0.6). Between 30 and 90 days after surgery, 7.3% of patients in the open group and 10% in the MIS group had grade 3 complications (p = 0.5). The most common complication was bladder neck contracture (BNC), representing 40% of the 30-90 day complications. Within one year of SRP, 81 patients (31%, 95% CI 25%, 37%) developed BNC; we saw non-significant lower rates in MIS (25 vs 32%; p = 0.4). Functional outcomes were poor after SRP and showed no difference between open and MIS groups for urinary continence (16 vs 18%, p = 0.7) and erectile function (7 vs 13%, p = 0.4). 5 year cancer-specific survival and overall survival was 95% and 88% for the entire cohort, respectively. Conclusions Our outcomes suggest poor functional recovery after SRP, regardless of the operative approach. Currently there is no evidence favoring the use of open or MIS approach. Further studies are required to ensure comparable outcomes between these approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1644
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Ten-Year Outcomes of High-Dose, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Alicikus, Zumre A.
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Pei, Xin
    Hunt, Margie
    Kollmeier, Marisa
    Cox, Brett
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    [J]. CANCER, 2011, 117 (07) : 1429 - 1437
  • [2] External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study
    Bolla, Michel
    Van Tienhoven, Geertjan
    Warde, Padraig
    Dubois, Jean Bernard
    Mirimanoff, Rene-Olivier
    Storme, Guy
    Bernier, Jacques
    Kuten, Abraham
    Sternberg, Cora
    Billiet, Ignace
    Lopez Torecilla, Jose
    Pfeffer, Raphael
    Cutajar, Carmel Lino
    Van der Kwast, Theodore
    Collette, Laurence
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (11) : 1066 - 1073
  • [3] Cancer Control and Functional Outcomes of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radiation-recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Chade, Daher C.
    Eastham, James
    Graefen, Markus
    Hu, Jim C.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Klotz, Laurence
    Montorsi, Francesco
    van Poppel, Hendrik
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) : 961 - 971
  • [4] Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radiation-recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Collaboration
    Chade, Daher C.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Savage, Caroline J.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Blute, Michael L.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Joniau, Steven
    Godoy, Guilherme
    Hurtado-Coll, Antonio
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Dall'Oglio, Marcos
    Srougi, Miguel
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (02) : 205 - 210
  • [5] ROUTINE PROSTATE BIOPSIES FOLLOWING RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - RESULTS FOR 226 PATIENTS
    CROOK, JM
    PERRY, GA
    ROBERTSON, S
    ESCHE, BA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (04) : 624 - 631
  • [6] Changes in Initial Treatment for Prostate Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999-2007
    Dinan, Michaela A.
    Robinson, Timothy J.
    Zagar, Timothy M.
    Scales, Charles D., Jr.
    Curtis, Lesley H.
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Lee, W. Robert
    Schulman, Kevin A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (05): : E781 - E786
  • [7] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [8] Incidence of urethral stricture after primary treatment for prostate cancer: Data from CaPSURE
    Elliott, Sean P.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Elkin, Eric P.
    McAninch, Jack W.
    Duchane, Janeen
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (02) : 529 - 534
  • [9] Impact of Prior Prostate Radiation on Complications After Radical Prostatectomy
    Gotto, Geoffrey T.
    Yunis, Luis Herran
    Vora, Kinjal
    Eastham, James A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Rabbani, Farhang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (01) : 136 - 142
  • [10] Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Hu, Jim C.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Barry, Michael J.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Weinberg, Aaron C.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (14): : 1557 - 1564