The Effect of a Golden Hour Policy on the Morbidity and Mortality of Combat Casualties

被引:296
作者
Kotwal, Russ S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Howard, Jeffrey T. [1 ]
Orman, Jean A. [1 ]
Tarpey, Bruce W. [1 ]
Bailey, Jeffrey A. [1 ,2 ]
Champion, Howard R. [2 ]
Mabry, Robert L. [1 ]
Holcomb, John B. [4 ]
Gross, Kirby R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] US Army Inst Surg Res, Joint Trauma Syst, 3698 Chambers Pass, Joint Base San Antonio F, TX 78234 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[3] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, College Stn, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Sch, Ctr Translat Injury Res, Houston, TX USA
关键词
PREHOSPITAL TIME; TRAUMA; CARE; BATTLEFIELD; EVACUATION; INJURY; VIETNAM; IMPACT; DEATH; AFGHANISTAN;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3104
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE The term golden hour was coined to encourage urgency of trauma care. In 2009, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates mandated prehospital helicopter transport of critically injured combat casualties in 60 minutes or less. OBJECTIVES To compare morbidity and mortality outcomes for casualties before vs after the mandate and for those who underwent prehospital helicopter transport in 60 minutes or less vs more than 60 minutes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective descriptive analysis of battlefield data examined 21 089 US military casualties that occurred during the Afghanistan conflict from September 11, 2001, to March 31, 2014. Analysis was conducted from September 1, 2014, to January 21, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Data for all casualties were analyzed according to whether they occurred before or after the mandate. Detailed data for those who underwent prehospital helicopter transport were analyzed according to whether they occurred before or after the mandate and whether they occurred in 60 minutes or less vs more than 60 minutes. Casualties with minor wounds were excluded. Mortality and morbidity outcomes and treatment capability-related variables were compared. RESULTS For the total casualty population, the percentage killed in action (16.0%[386 of 2411] vs 9.9% [964 of 9755]; P<.001) and the case fatality rate ([CFR] 13.7 [469 of 3429] vs 7.6 [1344 of 17 660]; P<.001) were higher before vs after the mandate, while the percentage died of wounds (4.1%[83 of 2025] vs 4.3%[380 of 8791]; P=.71) remained unchanged. Decline in CFR after the mandate was associated with an increasing percentage of casualties transported in 60 minutes or less (regression coefficient, -0.141; P<.001), with projected vs actual CFR equating to 359 lives saved. Among 4542 casualties (mean injury severity score, 17.3; mortality, 10.1%[457 of 4542]) with detailed data, there was a decrease in median transport time after the mandate (90 min vs 43 min; P<.001) and an increase in missions achieving prehospital helicopter transport in 60 minutes or less (24.8%[181 of 731] vs 75.2% [2867 of 3811]; P<.001). When adjusted for injury severity score and time period, the percentage killed in action was lower for those critically injured who received a blood transfusion (6.8%[40 of 589] vs 51.0% [249 of 488]; P<.001) and were transported in 60 minutes or less (25.7%[205 of 799] vs 30.2%[84 of 278]; P<.01), while the percentage died of wounds was lower among those critically injured initially treated by combat support hospitals (9.1%[48 of 530] vs 15.7%[86 of 547]; P<.01). Acute morbidity was higher among those critically injured who were transported in 60 minutes or less (36.9%[295 of 799] vs 27.3%[76 of 278]; P<.01), those severely and critically injured initially treated at combat support hospitals (severely injured, 51.1% [161 of 315] vs 33.1%[104 of 314]; P<.001; and critically injured, 39.8%[211 of 530] vs 29.3%[160 of 547]; P<.001), and casualties who received a blood transfusion (50.2%[618 of 1231] vs 3.7%[121 of 3311]; P<.001), emphasizing the need for timely advanced treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A mandate made in 2009 by Secretary of Defense Gates reduced the time between combat injury and receiving definitive care. Prehospital transport time and treatment capability are important factors for casualty survival on the battlefield.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
  • [2] Performance improvement evaluation of forward aeromedical evacuation platforms in Operation Enduring Freedom
    Apodaca, Amy
    Olson, Chris M., Jr.
    Bailey, Jeffrey
    Butler, Frank
    Eastridge, Brian J.
    Kuncir, Eric
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2013, 75 : S157 - S163
  • [3] THE IMPACT OF A ROTORCRAFT AEROMEDICAL EMERGENCY CARE SERVICE ON TRAUMA MORTALITY
    BAXT, WG
    MOODY, P
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 249 (22): : 3047 - 3051
  • [4] BELLAMY RF, 1984, MIL MED, V149, P55
  • [6] Is it the H or the EMS in HEMS that has an impact on trauma patient mortality? A systematic review of the evidence
    Butler, Daniel P.
    Anwar, Imran
    Willett, Keith
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2010, 27 (09) : 692 - 701
  • [7] Butler FK, 2011, PHTLS PREHOSPITAL TR
  • [8] Battlefield trauma care then and now: A decade of Tactical Combat Casualty Care
    Butler, Frank K., Jr.
    Blackbourne, Lorne H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 73 : S395 - S402
  • [9] A meta-analysis of prehospital care times for trauma
    Carr, Brendan G.
    Caplan, Joel M.
    Pryor, John P.
    Branas, Charles C.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2006, 10 (02) : 198 - 206
  • [10] A profile of combat injury
    Champion, HR
    Bellamy, RF
    Roberts, CP
    Leppaniemi, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 54 (05): : S13 - S19