Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: The STEEP system

被引:686
作者
Hudis, Clifford A.
Barlow, William E.
Costantino, Joseph P.
Gray, Robert J.
Pritchard, Kathleen I.
Chapman, Judith-Anne W.
Sparano, Joseph A.
Hunsberger, Sally
Enos, Rebecca A.
Gelber, Richard D.
Zujewski, Jo Anne
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Breast Canc Med Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Canc Res & Biostat, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Biostat, Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] NCI, Div Canc Treatment & Diag, Biometr Res Branch, Rockville, MD USA
[7] EMMES Corp, Rockville, MD USA
[8] NCI, Div Canc Treatment & Diag, Canc Therapy Evaluat Program, Rockville, MD USA
[9] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[11] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3523
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Standardized definitions of breast cancer clinical trial end points must be adopted to permit the consistent interpretation and analysis of breast cancer clinical trials and to facilitate cross-trial comparisons and meta-analyses. Standardizing terms will allow for uniformity in data collection across studies, which will optimize clinical trial utility and efficiency. A given end point term (eg, overall survival) used in a breast cancer trial should always encompass the same set of events (eg, death attributable to breast cancer, death attributable to cause other than breast cancer, death from unknown cause), and, in turn, each event within that end point should be commonly defined across end points and studies. Methods A panel of experts in breast cancer clinical trials representing medical oncology, biostatistics, and correlative science convened to formulate standard definitions and address the confusion that nonstandard definitions of widely used end point terms for a breast cancer clinical trial can generate. We propose standard definitions for efficacy end points and events in early-stage adjuvant breast cancer clinical trials. In some cases, it is expected that the standard end points may not address a specific trial question, so that modified or customized end points would need to be prospectively defined and consistently used. Conclusion The use of the proposed common end point definitions will facilitate interpretation of trial outcomes. This approach may be adopted to develop standard outcome definitions for use in trials involving other cancer sites.
引用
收藏
页码:2127 / 2132
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Baum M, 2002, LANCET, V359, P2131
  • [2] A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer
    Coombes, RC
    Hall, E
    Gibson, LJ
    Paridaens, R
    Jassem, J
    Delozier, T
    Jones, SE
    Alvarez, I
    Bertelli, G
    Ortmann, O
    Coates, AS
    Bajetta, E
    Dodwell, D
    Coleman, RE
    Fallowfield, LJ
    Mickiewicz, E
    Andersen, J
    Lonning, PE
    Cocconi, G
    Stewart, A
    Stuart, N
    Snowdon, CF
    Carpentieri, M
    Massimini, G
    Bliss, JM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (11) : 1081 - 1092
  • [3] A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer
    Goss, PE
    Ingle, JN
    Martino, S
    Robert, NJ
    Muss, HB
    Piccart, MJ
    Castiglione, M
    Tu, D
    Shepherd, LE
    Pritchard, KI
    Livingston, RB
    Davidson, NE
    Norton, L
    Perez, EA
    Abrams, JS
    Therasse, P
    Palmer, MJ
    Pater, JL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (19) : 1793 - 1802
  • [4] Green S., 2003, CLIN TRIALS ONCOLOGY, P44
  • [5] Switching of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years' adjuvant tamoxifen: combined results of ABCSG trial 8 and ARNO 95 trial
    Jakesz, R
    Jonat, W
    Gnant, M
    Mittlboeck, M
    Greil, R
    Tausch, C
    Hilfrich, J
    Kwasny, W
    Menzel, C
    Samonigg, H
    Seifert, M
    Gademann, G
    Kaufmann, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9484) : 455 - 462
  • [6] KALBFLEISCH JD, 2002, STAT ANAL FAILURE TI, P195
  • [7] Thürlimann B, 2005, NEW ENGL J MED, V353, P2747