Relationship between the masticatory muscles and mandibular skeleton in mandibular Prognathism with and without asymmetry

被引:35
作者
Kwon, Tae-Geon
Lee, Ki-Ho
Park, Hyo-Sang
Ryoo, Hyun-Mo
Kim, Hyun-Jung
Lee, Sang-Han
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Taegu 700421, South Korea
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Taegu, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Cell & Dev Biol, Sch Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Pedodont, Taegu, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2006.09.024
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between masticatory muscle volume and mandibular skeletal measurements in patients with and without facial asymmetry. This was done in order to determine whether asymmetric mandibular prognathism is related to masticatory muscle asymmetry. Patients and Methods: The study was conducted with 40 adult patients with mandibular prognathism composed of 2 groups, the asymmetry group (n = 20) and the nonasymmetry group (n = 20). Using 3-dimensional reformatted computed tomography (CT) images, the volume of masticatory muscle (masseter, temporal, medial, and lateral pterygoid muscles) and various skeletal measurements (hemimandibular volume, ramal height, body length, mandibular length, gonial angle) were evaluated and compared. The right-left difference was expressed by an asymmetry index {(right - left)/left, %}. Results: The results showed that in the asymmetry group, the longer mandibular side (contralateral side of chin deviation) exhibited longer ramal and body length, a wider gonial angle, and more hemimandibular volume with less medial pterygoid volume, whereas the nonasymmetry group did not show a statistical bilateral difference between the skeletal and muscular measurements. The correlation analysis showed that patients with facial asymmetry did not have similar patterns of muscle-bone relation as compared with the symmetrical subjects. Conclusion: inpatients with mandibular prognathism, the bilateral difference in muscle volume would reflect the difference in the spatial anatomy of a skeletal structure and could not predict mandibular skeletal asymmetry. (c) 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1538 / 1543
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology [J].
Benington, PCM ;
Gardener, JE ;
Hunt, NP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1999, 21 (06) :659-670
[2]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JAW MUSCLE VOLUME AND CRANIOFACIAL FORM [J].
GIONHAKU, N ;
LOWE, AA .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 68 (05) :805-809
[4]   Relationship in hypoplasia between the masticatory muscles and the craniofacial skeleton in hemifacial microsomia, as determined by 3-D CT imaging [J].
Huisinga-Fischer, CE ;
Zonneveld, FW ;
Vaandrager, JM ;
Prahl-Andersen, B .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 12 (01) :31-40
[5]   Relationship between bone and muscles of mastication in hemifacial microsomia [J].
Kane, AA ;
Lo, LJ ;
Christensen, GE ;
Vannier, MW ;
Marsh, JL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 99 (04) :990-997
[6]   MASTICATORY MUSCLE INFLUENCE ON CRANIOFACIAL GROWTH [J].
KILIARIDIS, S .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 53 (03) :196-202
[7]   Human masticatory muscle volume and zygomatico-mandibular form in adults with mandibular prognathism [J].
Kitai, N ;
Fujii, Y ;
Murakami, S ;
Furukawa, S ;
Kreiborg, S ;
Takada, K .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 (11) :752-756
[8]   Maxillofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults [J].
Kubota, M ;
Nakano, H ;
Sanjo, I ;
Satoh, K ;
Sanjo, T ;
Kamegai, T ;
Ishikawa, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1998, 20 (05) :535-542
[9]  
Kwon OW, 1989, KOREAN J ORTHOD, V19, P35
[10]   A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry - a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography [J].
Kwon, TG ;
Park, HS ;
Ryoo, HM ;
Lee, SH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 35 (01) :43-48