A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS)

被引:312
作者
Korkmaz, Ozgen [1 ]
Cakir, Recep [2 ]
Ozden, M. Yasar [3 ]
机构
[1] Amasya Univ, Fac Technol, Dept Comp Engn, Amasya, Turkey
[2] Amasya Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, Fac Educ, Amasya, Turkey
[3] Eastern Mediterranean Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, TRNC, TR-10 Famagusta, Mersin, Turkey
关键词
Computer-mediated communication; Valuation methodologies; Pedagogical issues; Programming and programming languages; Teaching/learning strategies; EDUCATION; ATTITUDE; STATE; K-12;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is possible to define Computational Thinking briefly as having the knowledge, skill and attitudes necessary to be able to use the computers in the solution of the life problems for production purposes. In this study, a scale has been developed for the purpose of determining the levels of computational thinking skills (CTS) of the students. CTS is a five-point likert type scale and consists of 29 items that could be collected under five factors. The study group of this work consists of 726 students educated at the levels of associate degree and undergraduate degree with formal education in Amasya University for the first application. For the second application 580 students who were educated in pedagogical formation education via distance education in Amasya University. The validity and reliability of the scale have been studied by conducting exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, item distinctiveness analyses, internal consistency coefficients and constancy analyses. As a result of the conducted analyses, it has been concluded that the scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that could measure the computational thinking skills of the students. In addition; the digital age individuals are expected to have the computational thinking skill, and at what degree they have these skills, the revelation of whether the levels they have are sufficient or not are a requirement. Within this frame, it could be said that the scale could make significant contributions to the literature. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 569
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[31]   Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field [J].
Grover, Shuchi ;
Pea, Roy .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2013, 42 (01) :38-43
[32]  
Gunuc S., 2013, Journal Of Theory Practice In Education (JTPE), V9, P436
[33]  
Halpern D.F, 1996, THOUGHTS KNOWLEDGE I
[34]  
Hovardaoglu S, 2000, DAVRARNS BILIMLERI I
[35]  
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), 2015, CT LEAD TOOLK
[36]   The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings [J].
Johnson, David W. ;
Johnson, Roger T. ;
Smith, Karl .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 19 (01) :15-29
[37]  
Kazanci O., 1989, Egitimde Elestirici Dusunme ve Ogretimi
[38]  
Kline R.B., 2005, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, DOI DOI 10.15353/CGJSC.V1I1.3787
[39]  
Kline R.B., 1994, EASY GUIDE FACTOR AN
[40]   A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS) [J].
Korkmaz, Ozgen .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 59 (04) :1162-1169