Pulse pressure variation and pleth variability index as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, Do-Hyeong [1 ]
Shin, Seokyung [1 ]
Kim, Ji Young [1 ]
Kim, Seung Hyun [2 ]
Jo, Minju [2 ]
Choi, Yong Seon [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Anesthesia & Pain Res Inst, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
来源
THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT | 2018年 / 14卷
关键词
fluid therapy; intraoperative monitoring; prone position; stroke volume; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; TRANSESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER; RESPIRATORY VARIATIONS; HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE; ESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER; CARDIAC-OUTPUT; ZONE APPROACH; GREY ZONE; VOLUME; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.2147/TCRM.S170395
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study investigated the ability of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and pleth variability index (PVI) to predict fluid responsiveness of patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position. Patients and methods: A total of 53 patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion in the prone position on a Jackson table were studied. PPV, PVI, and hemodynamic and respiratory variables were measured both before and after the administration of 6 mL/kg colloid in both the supine and prone positions. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a 15% or greater increase in stroke volume index, as assessed by esophageal Doppler monitor after fluid loading. Results: In the supine position, 40 patients were responders. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for PPV and PVI were 0.783 [95% CI 0.648-0.884, P<0.001] and 0.814 (95% CI 0.684-0.908, P<0.001), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of PPV and PVI were 10% (sensitivity 75%, specificity 62%) and 8% (sensitivity 78%, specificity 77%), respectively. In the prone position, 27 patients were responders. The areas under the ROC curves for PPV and PVI were 0.781 (95% CI 0.646-0.883, P<0.001) and 0.756 (95% CI 0.618-0.863, P<0.001), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of PPV and PVI were 7% (sensitivity 82%, specificity 62%) and 8% (sensitivity 67%, specificity 69%), respectively. Conclusion: Both PPV and PVI were able to predict fluid responsiveness; their predictive abilities were maintained in the prone position.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1183
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of pulse pressure variation and corrected flow time as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients in the prone position
    Yang, S. -Y.
    Shim, J. -K.
    Song, Y.
    Seo, S. -J.
    Kwak, Y. -L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (05) : 713 - 720
  • [2] Pleth Variability Index to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Colorectal Surgery
    Hood, Julian A.
    Wilson, R. Jonathan T.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 113 (05) : 1058 - 1063
  • [3] Pleth Variability Index Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Adults During General Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgery
    Siswojo, Andy Sisnata
    Wong, Daniel Mun-Yen
    Tuong Dien Phan
    Kluger, Roman
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2014, 28 (06) : 1505 - 1509
  • [4] Evaluation of pulse pressure variation and pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated isoflurane-anesthetized dogs
    Sano, Hiroki
    Seo, Joonbum
    Wightman, Paul
    Cave, Nick J.
    Gieseg, Mike A.
    Johnson, Craig B.
    Chambers, Paul
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 28 (04) : 301 - 309
  • [5] Pleth variability index predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients
    Loupec, Thibault
    Nanadoumgar, Hodanou
    Frasca, Denis
    Petitpas, Franck
    Laksiri, Leila
    Baudouin, Didier
    Debaene, Bertrand
    Dahyot-Fizelier, Claire
    Mimoz, Olivier
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02) : 294 - 299
  • [6] Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery
    Zimmermann, Markus
    Feibicke, Thomas
    Keyl, Cornelius
    Prasser, Christopher
    Moritz, Stefan
    Graf, Bernhard M.
    Wiesenack, Christoph
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (06) : 555 - 561
  • [7] Pleth variability index versus pulse pressure variation for intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Coeckelenbergh, Sean
    Delaporte, Amelie
    Ghoundiwal, Djamal
    Bidgoli, Javad
    Fils, Jean-Francois
    Schmartz, Denis
    Van der Linden, Philippe
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [8] Is the pleth variability index a surrogate for pulse pressure variation in a pediatric population undergoing spine fusion?
    Feldman, Jeffrey M.
    Sussman, Emily
    Singh, Devika
    Friedman, Ben J.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 22 (03) : 250 - 255
  • [9] Ability of mini-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in obese patients undergoing surgery in the prone position
    Ali, Achmet
    Dorman, Yeser
    Abdullah, Taner
    Yasa, Ceren
    ORHAN-SUNGUR, Mukadder
    Akinci, Ibrahim O.
    ERGIN-OZCAN, Perihan
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2019, 85 (09) : 981 - 988
  • [10] Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine
    Monnet, X.
    Guerin, L.
    Jozwiak, M.
    Bataille, A.
    Julien, F.
    Richard, C.
    Teboul, J.-L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (02) : 207 - 213