The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: Using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners

被引:125
作者
Turner, Adam C. [1 ,2 ]
Zankl, Maria [3 ]
DeMarco, John J. [4 ]
Cagnon, Chris H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Di [1 ,2 ]
Angel, Erin [1 ,2 ]
Cody, Dianna D. [5 ]
Stevens, Donna M. [6 ]
McCollough, Cynthia H. [7 ]
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Biomed Phys, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] German Res Ctr Environm Hlth GmbH, Inst Radiat Protect, Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55901 USA
关键词
biological organs; computerised tomography; dosimetry; image scanners; Monte Carlo methods; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; MULTIDETECTOR CT MDCT; PATIENT; DOSIMETRY; MODELS; ADULT;
D O I
10.1118/1.3368596
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Methods: Monte Carlo simulations of 64-slice MDCT scanners from each of the four major manufacturers were performed. An adult female patient model from the GSF family of voxelized phantoms was used in which all ICRP Publication 103 radiosensitive organs were identified. A 120 kVp, full-body helical scan with a pitch of 1 was simulated for each scanner using similar scan protocols across scanners. From each simulated scan, the radiation dose to each organ was obtained on a per mA s basis (mGy/mA s). In addition, CTDIvol values were obtained from each scanner for the selected scan parameters. Then, to demonstrate the feasibility of generating organ dose estimates from scanner-independent coefficients, the simulated organ dose values resulting from each scanner were normalized by the CTDIvol value for those acquisition conditions. Results: CTDIvol values across scanners showed considerable variation as the coefficient of variation (CoV) across scanners was 34.1%. The simulated patient scans also demonstrated considerable differences in organ dose values, which varied by up to a factor of approximately 2 between some of the scanners. The CoV across scanners for the simulated organ doses ranged from 26.7% (for the adrenals) to 37.7% (for the thyroid), with a mean CoV of 31.5% across all organs. However, when organ doses are normalized by CTDIvol values, the differences across scanners become very small. For the CTDIvol, normalized dose values the CoVs across scanners for different organs ranged from a minimum of 2.4% (for skin tissue) to a maximum of 8.5% (for the adrenals) with a mean of 5.2%. Conclusions: This work has revealed that there is considerable variation among modern MDCT scanners in both CTDIvol and organ dose values. Because these variations are similar, CTDIvol can be used as a normalization factor with excellent results. This demonstrates the feasibility of establishing scanner-independent organ dose estimates by using CTDIvol to account for the differences between scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:1816 / 1825
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
AAPM, 2008, 96 AAPM
[2]   Dose to Radiosensitive Organs During Routine Chest CT: Effects of Tube Current Modulation [J].
Angel, Erin ;
Yaghmai, Nazanin ;
Jude, Cecilia Matilda ;
DeMarco, John J. ;
Cagnon, Christopher H. ;
Goldin, Jonathan G. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. ;
Primak, Andrew N. ;
Cody, Dianna D. ;
Stevens, Donna M. ;
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (05) :1340-1345
[3]   Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT [J].
Angel, Erin ;
Yaghmai, Nazanin ;
Jude, Cecilia Matilda ;
DeMarco, John J. ;
Cagnon, Christopher H. ;
Goldin, Jonathan G. ;
Primak, Andrew N. ;
Stevens, Donna M. ;
Cody, Dianna D. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. ;
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (03) :497-511
[4]  
[Anonymous], LAUR032202 LOS AL NA
[5]  
[Anonymous], TM8381 ORNL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, NISTIR
[7]   It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
McCollough, CH ;
Orton, CG .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (05) :1189-1191
[8]   A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms [J].
DeMarco, JJ ;
Cagnon, CH ;
Cody, DD ;
Stevens, DM ;
McCollough, CH ;
O'Daniel, J ;
McNitt-Gray, MF .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (17) :3989-4004
[9]  
Dixon RL, 2003, MED PHYS, V30, P1272, DOI 10.1118/1.1576952
[10]   Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from photon irradiation [J].
Eckerman, K. F. ;
Boch, W. E. ;
Zankl, M. ;
Petoussi-Henss, N. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2007, 127 (1-4) :187-191