Adiabatic Film Cooling Effectiveness Measurements Throughout Multirow Film Cooling Arrays

被引:26
作者
Natsui, Greg [1 ]
Little, Zachary [1 ]
Kapat, Jayanta S. [1 ]
Dees, Jason E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Ctr Adv Turbomachinery & Energy Res, Lab Turbine Aerodynam Heat Transfer & Durabil, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] GE Global Res, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2017年 / 139卷 / 10期
关键词
INJECTION;
D O I
10.1115/1.4035520
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Adiabatic film cooling effectiveness measurements are obtained using pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) on a flat film cooled surface. The effects of blowing ratio and hole spacing are investigated for four multirow arrays comprised of eight rows containing 52 holes of 3.8 mm diameter with 20 deg inclination angles and hole length-to-diameter ratio of 11.2. The four arrays investigated have two different hole-to-hole spacings composed of cylindrical and diffuser holes. For the first case, lateral and streamwise pitches are 7.5 times the diameter. For the second case, pitch-to-diameter ratio is 14 in lateral direction and 10 in the streamwise direction. The holes are in a staggered arrangement. Adiabatic effectiveness measurements are taken for a blowing ratio range of 0.3-1.2 and a density ratio of 1.5, with CO2 injected as the coolant. A thorough boundary layer analysis is presented, and data were taken using hotwire anemometry with air injection, with boundary layer, and turbulence measurements taken at multiple locations in order to characterize the boundary layer. Local effectiveness, laterally averaged effectiveness, boundary layer thickness, momentum thickness, turbulence intensity, and turbulence length scale are presented. For the cylindrical holes, at the first row of injection, the film jets are still attached at a blowing ratio of 0.3. By a blowing ratio of 0.5, the jet is observed to lift off, and then impinge back onto the test surface. At a blowing ratio of 1.2, the jets lift off, but reattach much further downstream, spreading the coolant further along the test surface. A thorough uncertainty analysis has been conducted in order to fully understand the presented measurements and any shortcomings of the measurement technique. The maximum uncertainty of effectiveness and blowing ratio is 0.02 counts of effectiveness and 3%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Thermal Effectiveness in Multiperforated Plates for Combustor Liner Effusion Cooling [J].
Andreini, Antonio ;
Facchini, Bruno ;
Picchi, Alessio ;
Tarchi, Lorenzo ;
Turrini, Fabio .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (09)
[2]  
Andrews G. E., 1995, 95GT274 ASME
[3]  
ASME, 2014, AM SOC MECH ENG
[4]   FULL-COVERAGE FILM COOLING .1. COMPARISON OF HEAT-TRANSFER DATA FOR 3 INJECTION ANGLES [J].
CRAWFORD, ME ;
KAYS, WM ;
MOFFAT, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1980, 102 (04) :1000-1005
[5]   Adiabatic wall effectiveness measurements of film-cooling holes with expanded exits [J].
Gritsch, M ;
Schulz, A ;
Wittig, S .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1998, 120 (03) :549-556
[6]   Full-coverage film cooling with short normal injection holes [J].
Harrington, MK ;
McWaters, MA ;
Bogard, DG ;
Lemmon, CA ;
Thole, KA .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (04) :798-805
[7]  
KASAGI N, 1981, 81GT37 ASME
[8]  
Kelly G. B., 2003, GT200338716 ASME
[9]   Full-Coverage Film Cooling: Film Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficients for Dense and Sparse Hole Arrays at Different Blowing Ratios [J].
Ligrani, Phil ;
Goodro, Matt ;
Fox, Mike ;
Moon, Hee-Koo .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2012, 134 (06)
[10]  
Ling J. P. C. W., 2002, GT200230528 ASME