A global bond: Explaining the safe-haven status of US Treasury securities

被引:24
作者
Hager, Sandy Brian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Dept Int Polit, London, England
[2] Harvard Univ, Weatherhead Ctr Int Affairs, 1737 Cambridge St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Capital flows; global finance; global financial crisis; inequality; power; public debt; PUBLIC DEBT; POWER; POLITICS; PREFERENCES; HEGEMONY; POLICY; INEQUALITY; OWNERSHIP; ECONOMY; ELITES;
D O I
10.1177/1354066116657400
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article offers new theoretical and empirical insights to explain the resilience of US Treasury securities as the world's premier safe or risk-free asset. The standard explanation of resilience emphasizes the relative safety of US Treasuries due to a shortage of safe assets in the global political economy. The analysis here goes beyond the standard explanation to highlight the importance of domestic politics in reinforcing the safe status of US Treasury securities. In particular, the research shows how a formidable bond of interests unites domestic and foreign owners of the public debt and works to sustain US power in global finance. Foreigners, who now own roughly half of the US public debt, have something to gain from their domestic counterparts. The top 1% of US households, which dominate domestic ownership of US Treasuries, has considerable political clout, thus alleviating foreign concerns about the creditworthiness of the US federal government. Domestic owners, in turn, benefit from the seemingly insatiable foreign appetite for US Treasury securities. In supplying the US federal government and US households with cheap credit, foreign investors in US Treasuries help to deflect challenges to the top 1% within the wealth and income hierarchy.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 580
页数:24
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ECONOMIST, V413, P79
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, AFFLUENCE INFLUENCE, DOI [DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7S1JN, 10.2307/j.ctt7s1jn]
[3]  
[Anonymous], FINANCIAL TIMES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, CITY CAPITAL POLITIC
[5]  
Arrighi G, 2005, NEW LEFT REV, P23
[6]   Tracking Global Demand for Advanced Economy Sovereign Debt [J].
Arslanalp, Serkan ;
Tsuda, Takahiro .
IMF ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 62 (03) :430-464
[7]  
Bartels LM, 2008, UNEQUAL DEMOCRACY: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE NEW GILDED AGE, P1
[8]  
Bradner E, 2015, CNN POLITICS 1012
[9]   INTENSIFYING GLOBAL DEPENDENCY - FOREIGN DEBT, STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT, AND THIRD-WORLD UNDERDEVELOPMENT [J].
BRADSHAW, YW ;
HUANG, J .
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 1991, 32 (03) :321-342
[10]  
Calomiris Charles W., 2014, Fragile by Design: The Political Origins of Banking Crises and Scarce Credit