Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection

被引:14
|
作者
Sehovic, Emir [1 ,2 ]
Urru, Sara [1 ,3 ]
Chiorino, Giovanna [1 ]
Doebler, Philipp [4 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Edo & Elvo Tempia, Canc Genom Lab, I-13900 Biella, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Life Sci & Syst Biol, I-10100 Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Unit Biostat Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Dept Cardiac Thorac Vasc Sci & Publ Hlth, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[4] TU Dortmund Univ, Dept Stat, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany
关键词
Meta-analysis; Diagnostic; Circulating cell-free; miRNAs; Breast cancer; BIOMARKERS; IDENTIFICATION; EXPRESSION; ACCURACY; SIGNATURES; PROGNOSIS; HEMOLYSIS; MIR-21; IMPACT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-022-09698-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women. Numerous studies explored cell-free circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers of BC. As inconsistent and rarely intersecting microRNA panels have been reported thus far, we aim to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance as well as the sources of heterogeneity between studies. Methods Based on the search of three online search engines performed up to March 21(st) 2022, 56 eligible publications that investigated diagnostic circulating microRNAs by utilizing Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) were obtained. Primary studies' potential for bias was evaluated with the revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). A bivariate generalized linear mixed-effects model was applied to obtain pooled sensitivity and specificity. A novel methodology was utilized in which the sample and study models' characteristics were analysed to determine the potential preference of studies for sensitivity or specificity. Results Pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 [0.81-0.88] and 0.83 [0.79-0.87] were obtained, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significantly better performance of multiple (sensitivity: 0.90 [0.86-0.93]; specificity: 0.86 [0.80-0.90]) vs single (sensitivity: 0.82 [0.77-0.86], specificity: 0.83 [0.78-0.87]) microRNA panels and a comparable pooled diagnostic performance between studies using serum (sensitivity: 0.87 [0.81-0.91]; specificity: 0.83 [0.78-0.87]) and plasma (sensitivity: 0.83 [0.77-0.87]; specificity: 0.85 [0.78-0.91]) as specimen type. In addition, based on bivariate and univariate analyses, miRNA(s) based on endogenous normalizers tend to have a higher diagnostic performance than miRNA(s) based on exogenous ones. Moreover, a slight tendency of studies to prefer specificity over sensitivity was observed. Conclusions In this study the diagnostic ability of circulating microRNAs to diagnose BC was reaffirmed. Nonetheless, some subgroup analyses showed between-study heterogeneity. Finally, lack of standardization and of result reproducibility remain the biggest issues regarding the diagnostic application of circulating cell-free microRNAs.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA for renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Li, Yong
    Chen, Peng
    Chen, Zhi
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (05) : 2265 - +
  • [32] Circulating cell-free DNA methylation as biomarker for lung cancer detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies
    Diana Inês Machado
    Tiago Brito-Rocha
    Sofia Salta
    Teresa Monjardino
    Rui Henrique
    Carmen Jerónimo
    Systematic Reviews, 14 (1)
  • [33] Clinical Significance of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Detection in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis
    Ye, Xueshi
    Li, Wanli
    Zhang, Lifei
    Yu, Junyao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [34] Diagnostic significance of circulating multiple miRNAs in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Shuduo
    Wang, Yanzhong
    Liu, Huixing
    Wang, Maofeng
    Yu, Haitao
    Qiao, Yingli
    Li, Fengying
    Xie, Xinyou
    Zhang, Jun
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 10 (06) : 661 - 674
  • [35] Prognostic value of circulating cell-free DNA in patients with pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Linyan
    Zhang, Yi
    Cheng, Yuan
    Zhang, Dan
    Zhu, Sha
    Ma, Xuelei
    GENE, 2018, 679 : 328 - 334
  • [36] Diagnostic Value of Circulating MicroRNAs for Endometriosis: a Meta-analysis
    Ling Zhou
    Yan Chen
    Jianhua Gao
    Sandhya Shankar
    Guangmei Zhang
    Reproductive Sciences, 2020, 27 : 793 - 805
  • [37] Diagnostic accuracy of ESR1 mutation detection by cell-free DNA in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Raei, Maedeh
    Heydari, Keyvan
    Tabarestani, Mohammad
    Razavi, Alireza
    Mirshafiei, Fatemeh
    Esmaeily, Fatemeh
    Taheri, Mahsa
    Hoseini, Aref
    Nazari, Hojjatollah
    Shamshirian, Danial
    Alizadeh-Navaei, Reza
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [38] Circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nan Wu
    Hongyan Sun
    Qian Sun
    Fangqing Zhang
    Lingli Ma
    Yue Hu
    Xianling Cong
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [39] Diagnostic value of circulating miR-155 for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Fang
    Wang, Jin
    Zhang, Hongjiang
    Fu, Baobao
    Zhang, Yanshun
    Jia, Qianqian
    Wang, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [40] Clinical diagnostic biomarker "circulating tumor cells" in breast cancer - a meta-analysis
    Bai, Shiyan
    Lin, Shujin
    Lin, Ting
    Wang, Qiaowen
    Cheng, Cui
    Lin, Junru
    Zhang, Ying
    Jiang, Xiwen
    Han, Xiao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13