Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection

被引:14
作者
Sehovic, Emir [1 ,2 ]
Urru, Sara [1 ,3 ]
Chiorino, Giovanna [1 ]
Doebler, Philipp [4 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Edo & Elvo Tempia, Canc Genom Lab, I-13900 Biella, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Life Sci & Syst Biol, I-10100 Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Unit Biostat Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Dept Cardiac Thorac Vasc Sci & Publ Hlth, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[4] TU Dortmund Univ, Dept Stat, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany
关键词
Meta-analysis; Diagnostic; Circulating cell-free; miRNAs; Breast cancer; BIOMARKERS; IDENTIFICATION; EXPRESSION; ACCURACY; SIGNATURES; PROGNOSIS; HEMOLYSIS; MIR-21; IMPACT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-022-09698-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women. Numerous studies explored cell-free circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers of BC. As inconsistent and rarely intersecting microRNA panels have been reported thus far, we aim to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance as well as the sources of heterogeneity between studies. Methods Based on the search of three online search engines performed up to March 21(st) 2022, 56 eligible publications that investigated diagnostic circulating microRNAs by utilizing Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) were obtained. Primary studies' potential for bias was evaluated with the revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). A bivariate generalized linear mixed-effects model was applied to obtain pooled sensitivity and specificity. A novel methodology was utilized in which the sample and study models' characteristics were analysed to determine the potential preference of studies for sensitivity or specificity. Results Pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 [0.81-0.88] and 0.83 [0.79-0.87] were obtained, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significantly better performance of multiple (sensitivity: 0.90 [0.86-0.93]; specificity: 0.86 [0.80-0.90]) vs single (sensitivity: 0.82 [0.77-0.86], specificity: 0.83 [0.78-0.87]) microRNA panels and a comparable pooled diagnostic performance between studies using serum (sensitivity: 0.87 [0.81-0.91]; specificity: 0.83 [0.78-0.87]) and plasma (sensitivity: 0.83 [0.77-0.87]; specificity: 0.85 [0.78-0.91]) as specimen type. In addition, based on bivariate and univariate analyses, miRNA(s) based on endogenous normalizers tend to have a higher diagnostic performance than miRNA(s) based on exogenous ones. Moreover, a slight tendency of studies to prefer specificity over sensitivity was observed. Conclusions In this study the diagnostic ability of circulating microRNAs to diagnose BC was reaffirmed. Nonetheless, some subgroup analyses showed between-study heterogeneity. Finally, lack of standardization and of result reproducibility remain the biggest issues regarding the diagnostic application of circulating cell-free microRNAs.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   Emergence of Circulating MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Efficacy Biomarkers [J].
Aggarwal, Vaishali ;
Priyanka, Kumari ;
Tuli, Hardeep Singh .
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY, 2020, 24 (02) :153-173
[2]  
Ahmed Mohmmed Elham, 2021, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, V22, P3513, DOI 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.11.3513
[3]  
Altman DG., 2011, STAT CONFIDENCE CONF, V2nd, P240
[4]   Serum microRNA as potential biomarker to detect breast atypical hyperplasia and early-stage breast cancer [J].
An, Xuefeng ;
Quan, Hong ;
Lv, Jinhui ;
Meng, Lingyu ;
Wang, Cheng ;
Yu, Zuoren ;
Han, Jing .
FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 (30) :3145-3161
[5]   Circulating miR-200c and miR-141 and outcomes in patients with breast cancer [J].
Antolin, Silvia ;
Calvo, Lourdes ;
Blanco-Calvo, Moises ;
Paz Santiago, Maria ;
Jose Lorenzo-Patino, Maria ;
Haz-Conde, Mar ;
Santamarina, Isabel ;
Figueroa, Angelica ;
Miguel Anton-Aparicio, Luis ;
Valladares-Ayerbes, Manuel .
BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
[6]   Combination of circulating miR-145-5p/miR-191-5p as biomarker for breast cancer detection [J].
Ashirbekov, Yeldar ;
Abaildayev, Arman ;
Omarbayeva, Nazgul ;
Botbayev, Dauren ;
Belkozhayev, Ayaz ;
Askandirova, Anel ;
Neupokoyeva, Alena ;
Utegenova, Gulzhakhan ;
Sharipov, Kamalidin ;
Aitkhozhina, Nagima .
PEERJ, 2020, 8
[7]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[8]   MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancer [J].
Boeri, Mattia ;
Verri, Carla ;
Conte, Davide ;
Roz, Luca ;
Modena, Piergiorgio ;
Facchinetti, Federica ;
Calabro, Elisa ;
Croce, Carlo M. ;
Pastorino, Ugo ;
Sozzi, Gabriella .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (09) :3713-3718
[9]   Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study [J].
Bramer, Wichor M. ;
Rethlefsen, Melissa L. ;
Kleijnen, Jos ;
Franco, Oscar H. .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
[10]   Evaluation of Plasma miR-21 and miR-152 as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Common Types of Human Cancers [J].
Chen, Hankui ;
Liu, Helu ;
Zou, Hanqing ;
Chen, Rui ;
Dou, Yuhong ;
Sheng, Shile ;
Dai, Shengming ;
Ai, Junmei ;
Melson, Joshua ;
Kittles, Rick A. ;
Pirooznia, Mehdi ;
Liptay, Michael J. ;
Borgia, Jeffrey A. ;
Deng, Youping .
JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 7 (05) :490-499