共 6 条
Impact of smart infusion technology on administration of anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin, argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin)
被引:28
作者:
Fanikos, John
Fiumara, Karen
Baroletti, Steve
Luppi, Carol
Saniuk, Catherine
Mehta, Amar
Silverman, Jon
Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Div Cardiovasc, Dept Med,Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pharm, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nursing, Boston, MA USA
关键词:
D O I:
10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.069
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
This study reviewed 863 alerts generated from the infusion of anticoagulants in 355 patients from October 2003 to January 2005. Alerts were generated by smart infusion technology pumps and recorded in the devices' memory. The most common alerts were underdose alerts (59.8%), followed by overdose alerts (31.3%) and duplicate drug therapy alerts (8.9%). In response to the alerts, users' most frequent action was to cancel (46.5%) or reprogram (43.1%) the infusions. The highest percentage of alerts occurred from 2 to 4 P.M. During the study, there were 4 infusion rate errors, compared with 15 in the immediately preceding 16-month period. In conclusion, smart infusion technology intercepted keypad entry errors, thereby reducing the likelihood of intravenous anticoagulant overdose or underdose. Dose or infusion rate programming during intravenous anticoagulation is an important targets for medication safety interventions. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1005
页数:4
相关论文