Intraperitoneal antineoplastic drug delivery: rationale and results

被引:193
作者
Markman, M
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland Clin, Taussig Canc Ctr R35, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(03)01074-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The use of intraperitoneal drug delivery in the treatment of malignant disease confined to the peritoneal cavity is based on the theoretical potential for increased exposure of the tumour to antineoplastic agents leading to improved cytotoxicity. Phase I studies have explored the safety and pharmacokinetic advantage of the regional administration of several drugs, including cisplatin (10 times higher than systemic delivery) and paclitaxel (1000 times higher). Phase II trials of second-line intraperitoneal chemotherapy of ovarian cancer, generally with cisplatin, have shown the potential for patients to achieve surgically-documented complete responses. Randomised trials of second-line regional therapy in patients with ovarian cancer have yet to be conducted, although non-randomised single institution experience has suggested the potential for long-term disease-free survival with this strategy. By contrast, several well-planned randomised trials of first-line intraperitoneal chemotherapy of small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer after primary surgical cytoreduction have reported a survival advantage with regional drug delivery. Although a rationale can be proposed for intraperitoneal antineoplastic drug delivery in non-ovarian malignant disease involving the peritoneal cavity, current data do not support the use of this strategy outside the confines of well-designed clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 283
页数:7
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
ALBERTS DS, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P5874
[2]  
ALBERTS DS, 1985, SEMIN ONCOL, V12, P38
[3]   IMPROVED THERAPEUTIC INDEX OF CARBOPLATIN PLUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS CISPLATIN PLUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE - FINAL REPORT BY THE SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP OF A PHASE-III RANDOMIZED TRIAL IN STAGE-III AND STAGE-IV OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
ALBERTS, DS ;
GREEN, S ;
HANNIGAN, EV ;
OTOOLE, R ;
STOCKNOVACK, D ;
ANDERSON, P ;
SURWIT, EA ;
MALVLYA, VK ;
NAHHAS, WA ;
JOLLES, CJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (05) :706-717
[4]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Liu, PY ;
Hannigan, EV ;
OToole, R ;
Williams, SD ;
Young, JA ;
Franklin, EW ;
ClarkePearson, DL ;
Malviya, VK ;
DuBeshter, B ;
Adelson, MD ;
Hoskins, WJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) :1950-1955
[5]  
ANTMAN KH, 1985, LANCET, V2, P977
[6]  
Armstrong DK, 2002, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V21, p201a
[7]   A phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide as consolidation therapy in patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer following negative surgical assessment [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Almadrones, L ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Brown, C ;
Shapiro, F ;
Curtin, JP ;
Spriggs, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 69 (01) :17-22
[8]   Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma: Results of long-term follow-up [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Bhaskaran, D ;
Revzin, M ;
Smith, A ;
Venkatraman, E ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Hensley, M ;
Soignet, S ;
Brown, C ;
Soslow, R ;
Markman, M ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Spriggs, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :694-698
[9]   Intraperitoneal interferon-α in residual ovarian carcinoma:: A Phase II Gynecologic Oncology Group study [J].
Berek, JS ;
Markman, M ;
Stonebraker, B ;
Lentz, SS ;
Adelson, MD ;
DeGeest, K ;
Moore, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 75 (01) :10-14
[10]   INTRAPERITONEAL ADMINISTRATION OF CISPLATIN AND 5-FLUOROURACIL IN RESIDUAL OVARIAN-CANCER - A PHASE-II GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP TRIAL [J].
BRALY, PS ;
BEREK, JS ;
BLESSING, JA ;
HOMESLEY, HD ;
AVERETTE, H .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 56 (02) :164-168