The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: Qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women

被引:41
作者
Javaid, Sarah [1 ]
Barringer, Sarah [2 ]
Compton, Sarah D. [3 ,4 ]
Kaselitz, Elizabeth [3 ]
Muzik, Maria [5 ]
Moyer, Cheryl A. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Global REACH, 1111 E Catherine St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Learning Hlth Sci, 1111 E Catherine St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Pregnancy; COVID-19; prenatal care; reproductive health care; perinatal mental health; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2021.102991
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore if and how women perceived their prenatal care to have changed as a result of COVID-19 and the impact of those changes on pregnant women. Design: Qualitative analysis of open-ended prompts included as part of an anonymous, online, cross-sectional survey of pregnant women in the United States. Setting: Online survey with participants from 47 states within the U.S. Participants: Self-identified pregnant women recruited through Facebook, Twitter, and other online sources. Measurements and findings: An anonymous, online survey of pregnant women (distributed April 3 - 24, 2020) included an open-ended prompt asking women to tell us how COVID-19 had affected their prenatal care. Openended narrative responses were downloaded into Excel and coded using the Attride-Sterling Framework. 2519 pregnant women from 47 states responded to the survey, 88.4% of whom had at least one previous birth. Mean age was 32.7 years, mean weeks pregnant was 24.3 weeks, and mean number of prenatal visits at the point of the survey was 6.5. Predominant themes of the open narratives included COVID-19's role in creating structural changes within the healthcare system (reported spontaneously by 2075 respondents), behavioral changes among both pregnant women and their providers (reported by 429 respondents), and emotional consequences for women who were pregnant (reported by 503 respondents) during the pandemic. Changes resulting from COVID-19 varied widely by provider, and women's perceptions of the impact on quality of care ranged from perceiving care as extremely compromised to perceiving it to be improved as a result of the pandemic. Key conclusions and Implications for practice: Women who are pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic have faced enormous upheaval as hospitals and healthcare providers have struggled to meet the simultaneous and often competing demands of infection prevention, pandemic preparedness, high patient volumes of extremely sick patients, and the needs of 'non-urgent' pregnant patients. In some settings, women described very few changes, whereas others reported radical changes implemented seemingly overnight. While infection rates may drive variable responses, these inconsistencies raise important questions regarding the need for local, state, national, or even global recommendations for the care of pregnant women during a global pandemic such as COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] ACOG, 2020, COR COVID 19 PREGN B
  • [2] Analysis of the Impact of the Confinement Resulting from COVID-19 on the Lifestyle and Psychological Wellbeing of Spanish Pregnant Women: An Internet-Based Cross-Sectional Survey
    Bivia-Roig, Gemma
    Lucia La Rosa, Valentina
    Gomez-Tebar, Maria
    Serrano-Raya, Lola
    Jose Amer-Cuenca, Juan
    Caruso, Salvatore
    Commodari, Elena
    Barrasa-Shaw, Antonio
    Francisco Lison, Juan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (16) : 1 - 14
  • [3] The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence
    Brooks, Samantha K.
    Webster, Rebecca K.
    Smith, Louise E.
    Woodland, Lisa
    Wessely, Simon
    Greenberg, Neil
    Rubin, Gideon James
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10227) : 912 - 920
  • [4] Re-examining pregnancy-related anxiety: A replication study
    Brunton, Robyn
    Dryer, Rachel
    Saliba, Anthony
    Kohlhoff, Jane
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2019, 32 (01) : E131 - E137
  • [5] A call for action for COVID-19 surveillance and research during pregnancy
    Buekens, Pierre
    Alger, Jackeline
    Breart, Gerard
    Cafferata, Maria Luisa
    Harville, Emily
    Tomasso, Giselle
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (07): : E877 - E878
  • [6] Caniglia E.C., 2020, AM J OBSTET GYNECOLO, DOI [10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1198, DOI 10.1016/J.AJ0G.2020.12.1198]
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, Framework for Healthcare Systems Providing Non-COVID-19 Clinical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic [WWW Document]
  • [8] Moms Are Not OK: COVID-19 and Maternal Mental Health
    Davenport, Margie H.
    Meyer, Sarah
    Meah, Victoria L.
    Strynadka, Morgan C.
    Khurana, Rshmi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 1
  • [9] Prevalence and Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Illness in Symptomatic Pregnant and Postpartum Women Stratified by Hispanic Ethnicity
    Goldfarb, Ilona Telefus
    Clapp, Mark A.
    Soffer, Marti D.
    Shook, Lydia L.
    Rushfirth, Katherine
    Edlow, Andrea G.
    Boatin, Adeline A.
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Barth, William H., Jr.
    Bryant, Allison S.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (02) : 300 - 302
  • [10] Goligoski E., 2020, PRENATAL CARE MAY LO