Understanding Employee Responses to Stressful Information Security Requirements: A Coping Perspective

被引:357
作者
D'Arcy, John [1 ]
Herath, Tejaswini [2 ]
Shoss, Mindy K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Brock Univ, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[3] St Louis Univ, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
coping theory; ethical orientation; information security; moral disengagement theory; sanctions; security compliance; security policies; security policy violation; social cognitive theory; technostress; workplace stress; MORAL DISENGAGEMENT; POLICY COMPLIANCE; BEHAVIORAL-RESEARCH; DETERRENCE; TECHNOLOGY; MODEL; JOB; TECHNOSTRESS; CHALLENGE; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.2753/MIS0742-1222310210
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We use coping theory to explore an underlying relationship between employee stress caused by burdensome, complex, and ambiguous information security requirements (termed "security-related stress" or SRS) and deliberate information security policy (ISP) violations. Results from a survey of 539 employee users suggest that SRS engenders an emotion-focused coping response in the form of moral disengagement from ISP violations, which in turn increases one's susceptibility to this behavior. Our multidimensional view of SRS-comprised of security-related overload, complexity, and uncertainty-offers a new perspective on the workplace environment factors that foster noncompliant user behavior and inspire cognitive rationalizations of such behavior. The study extends technostress research to the information systems security domain and provides a theoretical framework for the influence of SRS on user behavior. For practitioners, the results highlight the incidence of SRS in organizations and suggest potential mechanisms to counter the stressful effects of information security requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 318
页数:34
相关论文
共 75 条
[41]   Understanding compliance with internet use policy from the perspective of rational choice theory [J].
Li, Han ;
Zhang, Jie ;
Sarathy, Rathindra .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 48 (04) :635-645
[42]  
Liang HG, 2009, MIS QUART, V33, P71
[43]   The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice [J].
Lim, VKG .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (05) :675-694
[44]  
MacKenzie SB, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, P293
[45]   WHY EMPLOYEES DO BAD THINGS: MORAL DISENGAGEMENT AND UNETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR [J].
Moore, Celia ;
Detert, James R. ;
Trevino, Linda Klebe ;
Baker, Vicki L. ;
Mayer, David M. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (01) :1-48
[46]  
Nelson D.L., 1995, BEHAV INF TECHNOL, V9, P257
[47]   Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime [J].
Paternoster, R ;
Simpson, S .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1996, 30 (03) :549-583
[48]   Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes [J].
Pearsall, Matthew J. ;
Ellis, Aleksander P. J. ;
Stein, Jordan H. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2009, 109 (01) :18-28
[49]  
Perrewé PL, 1999, J ORGAN BEHAV, V20, P739, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199909)20:5<739::AID-JOB1949>3.0.CO
[50]  
2-C