Partnership Ties Shape Friendship Networks: A Dynamic Social Network Study

被引:30
作者
Stadtfeld, Christoph [1 ,2 ]
Pentland, Alex [3 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Social Networks, Clausiusstr 50, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] MIT, Media Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
MODELS; INVOLVEMENT; INTEGRATION; SUPPORT; BALANCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1093/sf/sov079
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Partnership ties shape friendship networks through different social forces. First, partnership ties drive clustering in friendship networks: individuals who are in a partnership tend to have common friends and befriend other couples. Second, partnership ties influence the level of homophily in these emerging friendship clusters. Partners tend to be similar in a number of attributes (homogamy). If one partner selects friends based on preferences for homophily, then the other partner may befriend the same person regardless of whether they also have homophilic preferences. Thus, two homophilic ties emerge based on a single partner's preferences. This amplification of homophily can be observed in many attributes (e.g., ethnicity, religion, age). Gender homophily, however, may be de-amplified, as the gender of partners differs in heterosexual partnerships. In our study, we follow dynamic friendship formation among 126 individuals and their cohabiting partners in a university-related graduate housing community over a period of nine months (N = 2,250 self-reported friendship relations). We find that partnership ties strongly shape the dynamic process of friendship formation. They are a main driver of local network clustering and explain a striking amount of homophily.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 477
页数:25
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Diversity in social support by role relations: A typology [J].
Agneessens, Filip ;
Waege, Hans ;
Lievens, John .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2006, 28 (04) :427-441
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1961, ACQUAINTANCE PROCESS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The psychology of interpersonal relations
[4]   From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium [J].
Berkman, LF ;
Glass, T ;
Brissette, I ;
Seeman, TE .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (06) :843-857
[5]  
Blau P., 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity
[6]   Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle [J].
Block, Per .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2015, 40 :163-173
[7]   A NOTE ON STRANGERS, FRIENDS AND HAPPINESS [J].
BURT, RS .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1987, 9 (04) :311-331
[8]   STRUCTURAL BALANCE - A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER THEORY [J].
CARTWRIGHT, D ;
HARARY, F .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1956, 63 (05) :277-293
[9]  
Clauset A, 2004, PHYS REV E, V70, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
[10]   CLUSTERING AND HIERARCHY IN INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS - TESTING 2 GRAPH THEORETICAL MODELS ON 742 SOCIOMATRICES [J].
DAVIS, JA .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1970, 35 (05) :843-851