'Experimental' or business as usual? Implementing the European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreement in Ghana

被引:38
作者
Hansen, Christian P. [1 ]
Rutt, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Acheampong, Emmanuel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Silviculture & Forest Management, Kumasi, Ghana
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
LEGALITY; TIMBER; SUSTAINABILITY; INDONESIA; MARKET; VPA;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we challenge recent positive assessments made of the European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs), through a case study of their implementation in Ghana. We do this through a review of the rich literature on forest governance in Ghana and the results of 160 semi-structured interviews with relevant actors in the country. While we agree that the VPA has helped establish new fora for dialogue in the forest sector in Ghana, we argue that it has not fundamentally changed the existing forest governance regime. Specifically, the VPA implementation has not changed tree tenure and benefit sharing practices, and by extension, the forestry concession system that for over 8 decades has failed to secure forest sustainability and social equity. The changes introduced through the VPA implementation the Timber Legality Assurance System, updated forest management plans, and an artisanal milling strategy, largely represent technical fixes to deeply political processes that have long upheld unsustainable practices. Other changes such as enhanced enforcement of Social Responsibility Agreements and more transparent allocations of timber rights are improvements, but they do not fundamentally change the tenure and benefit sharing arrangement, which by any standard is inequitable. Our evidence particularly contradicts Overdevest and Zeitlin's (2016, 2018) depiction of the country's VPA experience as an emerging 'experimentalist' forest governance entailing substantive dialogue, recursive problem-solving, and policy learning. At the contrary, and paradoxically, we argue that the VPA implementation in Ghana serves to stabilize and reproduce the very forest governance regime that it set out to reform a process that is much less 'experimental', and much more business as usual.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 82
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Aaronovitch Ben., 2016, The Hanging Tree, VKindle
[2]   Representation without accountability in forestry: experiences from the Social Responsibility Agreement in Ghana [J].
Agyei, Frank Kwaku ;
Adjei, Prince Osei-Wusu .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 80 :34-43
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Forest Products Annual Market Review 2008-2009, P1
[4]  
Ardayfio-Schandorf E, 2007, SOCIOECONOMIC PERSPE
[5]  
Ayine D. M, 2009, DEV LEGAL TOOLS CITI
[6]   The EU-Ghana VPA: a comprehensive policy analysis of its design [J].
Beeko, C. ;
Arts, B. .
INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2010, 12 (03) :221-230
[7]  
Beeko C, 2007, PROPOSED WOOD TRACKI
[8]  
Birikorang G, 2007, 1 VLTP FOR COMM
[9]  
BIRIKORANG G., 2014, Why don't we make the loggers pay? Stumpage value and policy failure in Ghana's forest sector
[10]  
Bollen A., 2013, Improving forest governance: A comparison of FLEGT VPAs and their impact