The Politics of Chinese and US Foreign Direct Investment in the Developing World

被引:9
作者
Biglaiser, Glen [1 ]
Lu, Kelan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Dept Polit Sci, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Dept Polit Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
Chinese state FDI; Chinese private FDI; US FDI; political risk; political ideology; DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS; INFLOWS; EXPROPRIATION; DETERMINANTS; CORPORATIONS; LOCATION; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1525/AS.2021.61.3.500
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
In the foreign direct investment (FDI) literature, studies show that investors prefer low-risk host states. However, the research focuses on investors from developed country democracies, such as the United States, ignoring the rise of China, an authoritarian developing country that engages in public and private investment. This paper investigates Chinese state and private FDI in 127 developing countries from 2003 to 2017 to determine the effects of political risk on FDI. We find that, as with US FDI, low-risk developing countries attract more Chinese state FDI, except in the case of natural resource investment, where Chinese investors appear to disregard risk concerns. For Chinese private FDI, on the other hand, political institutions seem to play no significant role, but political affiliations matter. Our work suggests that similarities between US and Chinese state FDI are increasing, while the investment strategies of Chinese private and state firms appear to be growing farther apart.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 531
页数:32
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Do Chinese state-owned and private enterprises differ in their internationalization strategies? [J].
Amighini, Alessia A. ;
Rabellotti, Roberta ;
Sanfilippo, Marco .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 27 :312-325
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Sovereignty at Bay: The Spread of U.S. Enterprises
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WORLD INVESTMENT REP
[4]  
Barro Robert J., 2013, 2013 Index of Economic Freedom, P41
[5]   The Conditional Nature of Political Risk: How Home Institutions Influence the Location of Foreign Direct Investment [J].
Beazer, Quintin H. ;
Blake, Daniel J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 62 (02) :470-485
[6]   New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions [J].
Beck, T ;
Clarke, G ;
Groff, A ;
Keefer, P ;
Walsh, P .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 15 (01) :165-176
[7]   Bank supervision and corruption in lending [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Demirguc-Kunt, Asli ;
Levine, Ross .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2006, 53 (08) :1861-1893
[8]   Political institutions, human capital and innovation: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Bekana, Dejene Mamo .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2019, 26 (04) :666-708
[9]   Following the flag: Troop deployment and US Foreign direct investment [J].
Biglaiser, Glen ;
DeRouen, Karl, Jr. .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2007, 51 (04) :835-854
[10]   Do Political Institutions Affect Foreign Direct Investment? A Survey of U.S. Corporations in Latin America [J].
Biglaiser, Glen ;
Staats, Joseph L. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2010, 63 (03) :508-522