Key criteria for sustainable wind energy planning-lessons from an institutional perspective on the impact assessment literature

被引:22
作者
Thygesen, Janne [1 ]
Agarwal, Abhishek [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Dept Media Cultures & Social Sci, N-4026 Stavanger, Norway
[2] Robert Gordon Univ, Aberdeen Business Sch, Dept Management, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, Scotland
关键词
Renewable energy; Sustainability; Planning; Environment; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; POWER PROJECTS; EIA; IMPLEMENTATION; SCOTLAND; FARMS; SEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.173
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An increasing number of researchers stress the importance of national planning institutions' role with respect to promoting an "effective" decision-making process in terms of bringing about sustainable energy. Impact assessment (IA) procedures are seen as having strong potential in supporting environmentally conscious energy production. This article discusses criteria for sustainable wind power planning and compares the centralised planning systems for wind energy in two countries - Norway and Scotland - as illustrating cases. We ask the following: What key criteria should be present to secure sustainable wind energy planning, and what are the critical institutional conditions to fulfil these criteria? A review of relevant IA literature reveals four key criteria for promoting sustainable wind planning: (i) clear and integrated political priorities, (ii) stakeholder involvement, (iii) strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and (iv) stringent permission and assessment requirements. We also determined that critical institutional 'conditions exist that effectively promote sustainable energy production: (a) coordinated energy policy institutions, (b) legitimate planning procedures, (c) that SEAS are followed in the decision-making process and (d) statutory planning regulations. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1023
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects [J].
Agterbosch, Susanne ;
Meertens, Ree M. ;
Vermeulen, Walter J. V. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (02) :393-405
[2]   A three-dimensional view of public participation in Scottish land-use planning: Empowerment or social control? [J].
Aitken, Mhairi .
PLANNING THEORY, 2010, 9 (03) :248-264
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Our common future
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NORWEGIAN MINISTRY E
[5]  
Bruhn-Tysk S., 2002, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V22, P129
[6]  
Campbell John., 2004, Institutional Change and Globalization
[7]  
Cooper L.M., 2002, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V22, P415
[8]  
Ellis G, 2009, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V10, P523
[9]  
Fischer T., 2003, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, V23, P155, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00094-X
[10]   Wind energy and environmental assessments - A hard look at two forerunners' approaches: Germany and the United States [J].
Geissler, Gesa ;
Koeppel, Johann ;
Gunther, Pamela .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 51 :71-78