Reproducibility and Interobserver Agreement of Different Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data Systems (TIRADS)

被引:10
作者
Sych, Yulia P. [1 ]
Fadeev, Valentin V. [1 ]
Fisenko, Elena P. [2 ]
Kalashnikova, Marina [1 ]
机构
[1] IM Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Dept Endocrinol 1, Minist Hlth Russian Federat, Sechenov Univ, Trubetskaya Ul 8,Bld 2, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] BV Petrovsky Natl Res Ctr Surg, Lab Ultrasound Diagnost, Fed State Res Inst, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Thyroid imaging; Thyroid nodules; Interobserver variability;
D O I
10.1159/000508959
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: A number of classification systems (TIRADS) have been developed to estimate the likelihood of malignancy in thyroid nodules, but their reproducibility is yet to be assessed. We evaluated the interobserver variability and diagnostic performance of the TIRADS in Kwak's modification (Kw-TIRADS) and European TIRADS (EU-TIRADS). Methods: Two independent specialists, blinded concerning the morphology of the nodules, evaluated ultrasound images of 153 thyroid nodules identified in 149 patients at multiple time points. Results: The interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa) was 0.52 and 0.67 for Kw-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS, respectively, and rated as substantial. There were strong correlations between Kw-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS for the two observers with Spearman's coefficients of 0.731 (p = 0.00025) and 0.661 (p = 0.0012), respectively. Sensitivity of Kw-TIRADS for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer was 95-92.31% and that of EU-TIRADS was 92.31-89.74%, with specificity of about 60% for both TIRADS. Conclusion: Despite the wide variability in the description of single ultrasonographic features, both Kw-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS may be a useful diagnostic tool in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 167
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Bershtejn LM, 2007, PRACT ONCOL, V8, P1
  • [2] Chandramohan Anuradha, 2016, Indian J Radiol Imaging, V26, P145, DOI 10.4103/0971-3026.178367
  • [3] The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology
    Cibas, Edmund S.
    Ali, Syed Z.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 132 (05) : 658 - 665
  • [4] Biologic and Clinical Perspectives on Thyroid Cancer
    Fagin, James A.
    Wells, Samuel A., Jr.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (11) : 1054 - 1067
  • [5] Interobserver agreement of various thyroid imaging reporting and data systems
    Grani, Giorgio
    Lamartina, Livia
    Cantisani, Vito
    Maranghi, Marianna
    Lucia, Piernatale
    Durante, Cosimo
    [J]. ENDOCRINE CONNECTIONS, 2018, 7 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [6] US Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Thyroid Malignancy: Diagnostic Performance of Seven Society Guidelines Applied to 2000 Thyroid Nodules
    Ha, Eun Ju
    Na, Dong Gyu
    Baek, Jung Hwan
    Sung, Jin Yong
    Kim, Ji-hoon
    Kang, So Young
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (03) : 893 - 900
  • [7] An Ultrasonogram Reporting System for Thyroid Nodules Stratifying Cancer Risk for Clinical Management
    Horvath, Eleonora
    Majlis, Sergio
    Rossi, Ricardo
    Franco, Carmen
    Niedmann, Juan P.
    Castro, Alex
    Dominguez, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2009, 94 (05) : 1748 - 1751
  • [8] Kondrat'eva TT, 2007, PRACT ONCOL, V8, P9
  • [9] Kwak JY, 2013, KOREAN J RADIOL, V14, P110
  • [10] MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA
    LANDIS, JR
    KOCH, GG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) : 159 - 174