Quantifying the psychomotor activating effects of cocaine in the rat

被引:40
作者
Flagel, Shelly B.
Robinson, Terry E.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Mol & Behav Neurosci Inst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY | 2007年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
cocaine; locomotion; multivariate analysis; psychostimulants; rat sensitization; stereotyped head movements;
D O I
10.1097/FBP.0b013e3281f522a4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Studies that involve analysis of the psychomotor activating effects of drugs often use locomotor activity as the sole measure of psychomotor activation. At low doses, psychostimulant drugs typically produce primarily locomotor hyperactivity. As dose is increased, behavior, however, changes in complex ways, in part because of a transition to behavior progressively dominated by more and more stereotyped actions, such as repetitive head movements. Thus, at some doses an increase in a drug effect is reflected by an increase in locomotion and at others by a decrease, making the interpretation of changes in locomotor activity difficult. Using an automated video analysis system (Clever Sys., Inc. Reston, Virginia, USA), we quantified various components of the psychomotor response to cocaine in the rat, including locomotor activity and lateral head movements, as well as the velocity and/or frequency of these behaviors. We report that the combination of these measures provides an especially sensitive measure of the psychornotor activating effects of cocaine, and how behavior changes as a consequence of repeated drug treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 302
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   BLOCKAGE OF AMPHETAMINE INDUCED MOTOR STIMULATION AND STEREOTYPY IN ADULT RAT FOLLOWING NEONATAL TREATMENT WITH 6-HYDROXYDOPAMINE [J].
CREESE, I ;
IVERSEN, SD .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1973, 55 (02) :369-382
[2]   A comparison of two behavioral measures of psychomotor activation following intravenous amphetamine or cocaine: dose- and sensitization-dependent changes [J].
Crombag, HS ;
Mueller, H ;
Browman, KE ;
Badiani, A ;
Robinson, TE .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 10 (02) :205-213
[3]   RATING BEHAVIORAL-EFFECTS OF AMPHETAMINE [J].
ELLINWOOD, EH ;
BALSTER, RL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1974, 28 (01) :35-41
[4]   Neural and behavioral plasticity associated with the transition from controlled to escalated cocaine use [J].
Ferrario, CR ;
Gorny, G ;
Crombag, HS ;
Li, YL ;
Kolb, B ;
Robinson, TE .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 58 (09) :751-759
[5]   Behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in rats: changes in the rhythm of head movements during focused stereotypies [J].
Fowler, SC ;
Birkestrand, B ;
Chen, R ;
Vorontsova, E ;
Zarcone, T .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 170 (02) :167-177
[6]   A force-plate actometer for quantitating rodent behaviors: illustrative data on locomotion, rotation, spatial patterning, stereotypies, and tremor [J].
Fowler, SC ;
Birkestrand, BR ;
Chen, R ;
Moss, SJ ;
Vorontsova, E ;
Wang, G ;
Zarcone, TJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2001, 107 (1-2) :107-124
[7]   AN OBSERVATIONAL METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING THE BEHAVIORAL-EFFECTS OF DOPAMINE AGONISTS - CONTRASTING EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE AND APOMORPHINE [J].
FRAY, PJ ;
SAHAKIAN, BJ ;
ROBBINS, TW ;
KOOB, GF ;
IVERSEN, SD .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 69 (03) :253-259
[8]   Sucrose intake enhances behavioral sensitization produced by cocaine [J].
Gosnell, BA .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 1031 (02) :194-201
[9]   Phenotypic analysis of dopamine receptor knockout mice; recent insights into the functional specificity of dopamine receptor subtypes [J].
Holmes, A ;
Lachowicz, JE ;
Sibley, DR .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 47 (08) :1117-1134
[10]   AMPHETAMINE AND APOMORPHINE RESPONSES IN RAT FOLLOWING 6-OHDA LESIONS OF NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS SEPTI AND CORPUS STRIATUM [J].
KELLY, PH ;
SEVIOUR, PW ;
IVERSEN, SD .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1975, 94 (03) :507-522