An Analysis of the Evolving Intellectual Structure of Health Information Systems Research in the Information Systems Discipline

被引:23
作者
Chen, Langtao [1 ]
Baird, Aaron [2 ,3 ]
Straub, Detmar [4 ]
机构
[1] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business & Informat Technol, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Robinson Coll Business, Inst Hlth Adm, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, Robinson Coll Business, Dept CIS, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[4] Temple Univ, Fox Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 08期
关键词
Health Information Systems (Health IS); Intellectual Structure; Scientometrics; Citation Analysis; Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA); Social Network Analysis (SNA); Thought Leadership; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEANINGFUL USE; TECHNOLOGY; QUALITY; CARE; RECORDS; IMPACT; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.17705/1jais.00561
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The rapid evolution of health information systems (Health IS) research has led to many significant contributions. However, while the Health IS subset of information systems (IS) scholarship has considerably grown over the past two decades, this growth has led to questions regarding the current intellectual structure of this area of inquiry. In an effort to more fully understand how Health IS research has contributed to the IS discipline, and what this may mean for future Health IS research in the IS domain, we conduct an in-depth evaluation of Health IS research published in mainstream IS journals. We apply citation analysis, latent semantic analysis (LSA), and social network analysis (SNA) to our data set of Health IS articles in order to: (1) identify Health IS research themes and thematic shifts, (2) determine which Health IS research themes are cohesive (versus disparate), (3) identify which Health IS research themes are central (versus peripheral), (4) clarify networks of researchers (i.e., thought leaders) contributing to these research themes, and (5) provide insights into the connection of Health IS research to its reference disciplines. Overall, we contribute a systematic description and explanation of the intellectual structure of Health IS research and highlight how the existing intellectual structure of Health IS research provides opportunities for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1074
页数:52
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Abbott A., 2001, The chaos of disciplines
  • [2] Abbott Andrew., 2014, SYSTEM PROFESSIONS E
  • [3] On the Intellectual Structure and Evolution of ISR
    Agarwal, Ritu
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (03) : 471 - 477
  • [4] The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead
    Agarwal, Ritu
    Gao, Guodong
    DesRoches, Catherine
    Jha, Ashish K.
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (04) : 796 - 809
  • [5] Andrews JE, 2003, J MED LIBR ASSOC, V91, P47
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1999, DEP DISCIPLINE
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2016, RES METHODS ESSENTIA
  • [8] [Anonymous], P 20 AM C INF SYST
  • [9] [Anonymous], MISQ RES CURATIONS
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2002, NETDRAW GRAPH VISUAL