The Law of Jante and generalized trust

被引:17
作者
Cappelen, Cornelius [1 ]
Dahlberg, Stefan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Comparat Polit, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Polit Sci, Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Bergen, Digital Social Sci Core Facil DIGSSCORE, Bergen, Norway
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Qual Govt Inst, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Culture; generalized trust; mentality; survey data; the law of Jante; SOCIAL TRUST; INDIVIDUALISM; COLLECTIVISM; SELF; BEHAVIOR; CULTURE; VALUES; RADIUS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0001699317717319
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
A widespread cultural phenomenon - and/or individual disposition - is the idea that one should never try to be more, try to be different, or consider oneself more valuable than other people. In Scandinavia this code of modesty is referred to as the 'Jante mentality', in Anglo-Saxon societies the 'tall poppy syndrome', and in Asian cultures 'the nail that stands out gets hammered down'. The study reported here examines how this modesty code relates to generalized trust. We argue, prima facie, that a positive and a negative relationship are equally plausible. Representative samples of the Norwegian population were asked about their agreement with the Jante mentality and the extent to which they have trust in other people. Two population surveys were conducted; one measuring individual level associations and another measuring aggregate level associations. It was found that the relationship between having a Jante mentality and trust is negative, at both levels of analysis and, furthermore, that the Jante mentality - this modesty code assumed to be instilled in Scandinavians from early childhood - is a powerful predictor of generalized trust.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 440
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alesina A. F., 2009, W14825 NAT BUR EC RE
[2]  
Alker H.R., 1969, QUANTITATIVE ECOLOGI
[3]   Individualism-collectivism and social capital [J].
Allik, J ;
Realo, A .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 35 (01) :29-49
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1984, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, TIDSSKRIFTET ANTROPO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1961, VARIATIONS VALUE ORI
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AR SVENSKEN MANNISKA
[10]   Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism [J].
Brewer, Marilynn B. ;
Chen, Ya-Ru .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (01) :133-151