How to approach pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: assessment of resectability using multidetector CT and tumor markers

被引:11
|
作者
Jeon, Sun Kyung [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun Sun [3 ]
Yu, Mi Hye [4 ]
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Yoon, Jeong Hee [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Jin-Young [5 ,6 ]
Lee, Kyoung Bun [7 ]
Lee, Sang Hyup [8 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehangno, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, 101 Daehangno, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Konkuk Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Canc Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Neoadjuvant therapy; Pancreatic neoplasm; Tomography; X-ray computed; UPFRONT SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; THERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL; CA19-9;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-08108-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate clinical and CT factors associated with local resectability in patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- radiation therapy (CRT). Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancers who underwent neoadjuvant CRT between June 2009 and June 2019. Tumor size, tumor-vascular contact with artery/vein, and local resectability categories (resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced) were assessed at baseline and post-CRT CT. Baseline and post-CRT carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels were also assessed. Clinical or imaging features related to R0 resection were determined using logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 179 patients (mean age, 62.4 +/- 9.3 years; 92 men) were included. After neoadjuvant CRT, 105 (58.7%) patients received R0 resection, while 74 (41.3%) did not. R0 resection rates were significantly different according to post-CRT CT resectability categories (p < 0.001): 82.8% (48/58), 70.1% (47/67), and 18.5% (10/54) for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced disease, respectively. For post-CRT borderline resectable disease, >= 50% decrease in CA 19-9 was significantly associated with R0 resection (odds ratio (OR), 3.160; p = 0.02). For post-CRT locally advanced disease, small post-CRT tumor size <= 2 cm (OR, 9.668; p = 0.026) and decreased tumor-arterial contact (OR, 24.213; p = 0.022) were significantly associated with R0 resection. Conclusion Post-CRT CT resectability categorization may be useful for the assessment of R0 resectability in patients with pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant CRT. Additionally, >= 50% decrease in CA 19-9 was associated with R0 resection in post-CRT borderline resectable disease, while small post-CRT tumor size and decreased tumor-arterial contact were with locally advanced disease.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 66
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relationship between surgical R0 resectability and findings of peripancreatic vascular invasion on CT imaging after neoadjuvant S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
    Yasuta, Sho
    Kobayashi, Tatsushi
    Aizawa, Hidetoshi
    Takahashi, Shinichiro
    Ikeda, Masafumi
    Konishi, Masaru
    Kojima, Motohiro
    Kuno, Hirofumi
    Uesaka, Katsuhiko
    Morinaga, Soichiro
    Miyamoto, Atsushi
    Toyama, Hirochika
    Takakura, Norihisa
    Sugimachi, Keishi
    Takayama, Wataru
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [42] Radiographic Response of Vessel Involvement and Resectability After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Naumann, Patrick
    Ottensmeier, Friederike
    Farnia, Benjamin
    Ben-Josef, Edgar
    Liermann, Jakob
    Maier-Hein, Klaus H.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Debus, Juergen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 43 (11): : 776 - 783
  • [43] Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Jeon, Hyun Jeong
    Lim, Soo Yeun
    Jeong, Hyejeong
    Yoon, So Jeong
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Shin, Sang Hyun
    Heo, Jin Seok
    Han, In Woong
    BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (08)
  • [44] Detecting Interval Metastases and Response Assessment Using 18F-FDG PET/CT After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
    Stiekema, Jurrien
    Vermeulen, Daan
    Vegt, Erik
    Voncken, Francine E. M.
    Aleman, Berthe M. P.
    Sanders, Joyce
    Boot, Henk
    van Sandick, Johanna W.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 39 (10) : 862 - 867
  • [45] Preoperative assessment of vascular invasion in exocrine pancreatic cancer by multidetector CT
    Shokry, Ahmed
    Mokhtar, Omnia
    Salah, Amr
    Gomaa, Mohammed
    Abdelmottelb, Ayman
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (03) : 417 - 423
  • [46] Tumor size measurements of pancreatic cancer with neoadjuvant therapy based on RECIST guidelines: is MRI as effective as CT?
    Yang, Panpan
    Mao, Kuanzheng
    Gao, Yisha
    Wang, Zhen
    Wang, Jun
    Chen, Yufei
    Ma, Chao
    Bian, Yun
    Shao, Chengwei
    Lu, Jianping
    CANCER IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [47] Retrospective Evaluation of Treatment Response in Patients with Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Cancer Using CT and CA 19-9
    Kim, Seung-Seob
    Lee, Sunyoung
    Lee, Hee Seung
    Bang, Seungmin
    Han, Kyunghwa
    Park, Mi-Suk
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 303 (03) : 548 - 556
  • [48] Prognostic Factors of Survival After Neoadjuvant Treatment and Resection for Initially Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Klaiber, Ulla
    Schnaidt, Eva S.
    Hinz, Ulf
    Gaida, Matthias M.
    Heger, Ulrike
    Hank, Thomas
    Strobel, Oliver
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Mihaljevic, Andre L.
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Hackert, Thilo
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 273 (01) : 154 - 162
  • [49] Spatial and phenotypic characterization of pancreatic cancer-associated fibroblasts after neoadjuvant treatment
    Nielsen, Michael Friberg Bruun
    Mortensen, Michael Bau
    Sorensen, Mia Dahl
    Wirenfeldt, Martin
    Kristensen, Bjarne Winther
    Schroder, Henrik Daa
    Pteiffer, Per
    Detlefsen, Sonke
    HISTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 35 (08) : 811 - 825
  • [50] Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Treatment
    van Roessel, Stijn
    van Veldhuisen, Eran
    Klompmaker, Sjors
    Janssen, Quisette P.
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    Alseidi, Adnan
    Balduzzi, Alberto
    Balzano, Gianpaolo
    Bassi, Claudio
    Berrevoet, Frederik
    Bonds, Morgan
    Busch, Olivier R.
    Butturini, Giovanni
    del Chiaro, Marco
    Conlon, Kevin C.
    Falconi, Massimo
    Frigerio, Isabella
    Fusai, Giuseppe K.
    Gagniere, Johan
    Griffin, Oonagh
    Hackert, Thilo
    Halimi, Asif
    Klaiber, Ulla
    Labori, Knut J.
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Marino, Marco V.
    Mortensen, Michael B.
    Nikov, Andrej
    Lesurtel, Mickael
    Keck, Tobias
    Kleeff, Jorg
    Pande, Rupaly
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Pietrasz, D.
    Roberts, Keith J.
    Cunha, Antonio Sa
    Salvia, Roberto
    Strobel, Oliver
    Tarvainen, Timo
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
    Wilmink, Johanna W.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Besselink, Marc G.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (11) : 1733 - 1740