Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis

被引:195
作者
Weibel, S. [1 ]
Jokinen, J. [1 ]
Pace, N. L. [2 ]
Schnabel, A. [1 ]
Hollmann, M. W. [3 ]
Hahnenkamp, K. [4 ]
Eberhart, L. H. J. [5 ]
Poepping, D. M. [6 ]
Afshari, A. [7 ]
Kranke, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Wuerzburg, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care, Oberduerrbacher Str 6, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Anaesthesiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care Emergency & Pain Me, Greifswald, Germany
[5] Univ Marburg, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Marburg, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Med, Munster, Germany
[7] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Juliane Marie Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
anaesthesia; lidocaine; outcome; pain; postoperative period; EFFECTIVE PAIN RELIEF; HOSPITAL STAY; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; BOWEL FUNCTION; DOUBLE-BLIND; CEREBRAL PROTECTION; MAJOR COMPLICATIONS; LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; INFORMATION SIZE;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aew101
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Improvement of postoperative pain and other perioperative outcomes remain a significant challenge and a matter of debate among perioperative clinicians. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of perioperative i.v. lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain and recovery in patients undergoing various surgical procedures. Methods: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and ClinicalTrials.gov, and congress proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials until May 2014, that compared patients who did or did not receive continuous perioperative i.v. lidocaine infusion. Results: Forty-five trials (2802 participants) were included. Meta-analysis suggested that lidocaine reduced postoperative pain (visual analogue scale, 0 to 10 cm) at 1-4 h (MD -0.84, 95% CI -1.10 to -0.59) and at 24 h (MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.11) after surgery, but not at 48 h (MD -0.22, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.03). Subgroup analysis and trial sequential analysis suggested pain reduction for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery or open abdominal surgery, but not for patients undergoing other surgeries. There was limited evidence of positive effects of lidocaine on postoperative gastrointestinal recovery, opioid requirements, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay. There were limited data available on the effect of systemic lidocaine on adverse effects or surgical complications. Quality of evidence was limited as a result of inconsistency (heterogeneity) and indirectness (small studies). Conclusions: There is limited evidence suggesting that i.v. lidocaine may be a useful adjuvant during general anaesthesia because of its beneficial impact on several outcomes after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 783
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]  
[Anonymous], PERIOPERATIVE MED
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANESTHESIOLOGY
[4]  
[Anonymous], EGYPTIAN J ANAESTHES
[5]  
[Anonymous], J ISFAHAN MED SCH
[6]  
[Anonymous], DOES INTRAVENO UNPUB
[7]  
Baral B K, 2010, Nepal Med Coll J, V12, P215
[8]   Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia - A meta-analysis [J].
Block, BM ;
Liu, SS ;
Rowlingson, AJ ;
Cowan, AR ;
Cowan, JA ;
Wu, CL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (18) :2455-2463
[9]   A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis [J].
Borenstein, Michael ;
Hedges, Larry V. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) :97-111
[10]   Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses [J].
Brok, Jesper ;
Thorlund, Kristian ;
Gluud, Christian ;
Wetterslev, Jorn .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (08) :763-769