Environmental impact and adaptation study of pig farming relocation in China

被引:19
作者
Zheng, Guodi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Mengqiu [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Yujun [3 ]
Yu, Bao [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Tongbin [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiaoyan [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Environm Remediat, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Acad Agr Planning & Engn, Inst Rural Energy & Environm Protect, Beijing 100125, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Pig farming relocation; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Feed conversion ratio; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; FOOTPRINT ASSESSMENT; SYSTEM; IMPROVEMENT; MANAGEMENT; NITROGEN; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106593
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the guidance of agri-food and water resources policies, some pig farms in China have gradually shifted their production from the Constrained Zone with a dense population and sensitive environment to the Potential Zone with richer feed resources and large environmental capacity. To evaluate whether the relocation is consistent with sustainable consumption and production, the study took the Key Zone with large pig production and supply as comparison object, constructed a life cycle assessment (LCA) model of pig production in the Constrained, Key, and Potential zones. The environmental impacts caused by the production of 1 ton of pork in these zones were 24.67 PE, 20.11 PE, and 20.44 PE, respectively, indicating that raising pigs in the Key and Potential zones is more environment-friendly than that in the Constrained Zone. Therefore, the relocation of pig farms from the Constrained Zone to the Potential Zone was found to be suitable for protecting water resources and environmental quality. Additionally, the Key Zone can maintain and even increase the existing breeding scale without transferring farms to the Potential Zone. LCA results showed that pork production has significant impacts on cancer risk, freshwater ecotoxicity, terrestrial eutrophication, and terrestrial acidification. Additionally, a majority of the environmental impacts result from crop and pig production, which are key processes in improving the pork supply chain. The soybean import ratio and feed conversion ratio are important indicators for reducing environmental impacts. Statement of novelty: To evaluate whether pig farm relocation in China is consistent with sustainable consumption and production, a life cycle assessment (LCA) model of pig production in the Constrained, Key, and Potential zones was conducted. According to the results, relocating farms from the Constrained Zone to the Key and Potential zones was more environment-friendly. The Key Zone can maintain and even increase the existing breeding scale without transferring the farms to the Potential Zone. LCA results showed that the majority of the environmental impacts result from crop and pig production. Thus, further guidance and education can be provided to farmers in the Potential and Key zones. In addition, sensitivity analysis indicated that large-scale farms should reduce the feed conversion ratio to reduce environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Assessment for the Cuban pig production: Case study in Sancti Spiritus
    Alba Reyes, Yasmani
    Barrera, Ernesto L.
    Sarduy Valle, Anisley
    Perez Gil, Maylier
    Hermida Garcia, Orestes
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 219 : 99 - 109
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, NAT DAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, 2006 IPCC GUIDELINES
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions and barriers to implementation in the Jordanian energy sector
    Jaber, JO
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (05) : 385 - 395
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, 14040 ISO, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.332.7550.1107
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, Environmental performance of pig supply chain: Guidelines for assessment. Livestock environmental assessment and performance partnership
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2020, RatSWD Output, V4, DOI [DOI 10.17620/02671.52, https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.52]
  • [9] A comparative study of a full value-chain water footprint assessment using two international standards at a large-scale hog farm in China
    Bai, Xue
    Ren, Xiaojing
    Khanna, Nina Zheng
    Zhang, Guoping
    Zhou, Nan
    Bai, Yan
    Hu, Mengting
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 176 : 557 - 565
  • [10] China's pig relocation in balance
    Bai, Zhaohai
    Jin, Shuqin
    Wu, Yan
    zu Ermgassen, Erasmus
    Oenema, Oene
    Chadwick, David
    Lassaletta, Luis
    Velthof, Gerard
    Zhao, Jun
    Ma, Lin
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (10) : 888 - 888