Trial of Electrical Direct-Current Therapy versus Escitalopram for Depression

被引:266
作者
Brunoni, A. R. [1 ,2 ]
Moffa, A. H. [2 ]
Sampaio-Junior, B. [1 ,2 ]
Borrione, L. [1 ,2 ]
Moreno, M. L. [2 ]
Fernandes, R. A. [2 ]
Veronezi, B. P. [2 ]
Nogueira, B. S. [2 ]
Aparicio, L. V. M. [1 ,2 ]
Razza, L. B. [2 ]
Chamorro, R. [2 ]
Tort, L. C. [2 ]
Fraguas, R. [1 ,2 ]
Lotufo, P. A. [2 ]
Gattaz, W. F. [1 ]
Fregni, F. [3 ]
Bensenor, I. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Lab Neurosci LIM 27, Dept & Inst Psychiat, Serv Interdisciplinary Neuromodulat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Univ Hosp, Interdisciplinary Ctr Appl Neuromodulat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Spaulding Neuromodulat Ctr, Boston, MA USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; NON-INFERIORITY; METAANALYSIS; VALIDATION; FLUOXETINE; EFFICACY; EPISODES; CORTEX; SCALE; TDCS;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1612999
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND We compared transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) with a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of depression. METHODS In a single-center, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving adults with unipolar depression, we randomly assigned patients to receive tDCS plus oral placebo, sham tDCS plus escitalopram, or sham tDCS plus oral placebo. The tDCS was administered in 30-minute, 2-mA prefrontal stimulation sessions for 15 consecutive weekdays, followed by 7 weekly treatments. Escitalopram was given at a dose of 10 mg per day for 3 weeks and 20 mg per day thereafter. The primary outcome measure was the change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression). Noninferiority of tDCS versus escitalopram was defined by a lower boundary of the confidence interval for the difference in the decreased score that was at least 50% of the difference in the scores with placebo versus escitalopram. RESULTS A total of 245 patients underwent randomization, with 91 being assigned to escitalopram, 94 to tDCS, and 60 to placebo. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean (+/- SD) decrease in the score from baseline was 11.3 +/- 6.5 points in the escitalopram group, 9.0 +/- 7.1 points in the tDCS group, and 5.8 +/- 7.9 points in the placebo group. The lower boundary of the confidence interval for the difference in the decrease for tDCS versus escitalopram (difference, -2.3 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.3 to -0.4; P = 0.69) was lower than the noninferiority margin of -2.75 (50% of placebo minus escitalopram), so noninferiority could not be claimed. Escitalopram and tDCS were both superior to placebo (difference vs. placebo, 5.5 points [95% CI, 3.1 to 7.8; P<0.001] and 3.2 points [95% CI, 0.7 to 5.5; P = 0.01], respectively). Patients receiving tDCS had higher rates of skin redness, tinnitus, and nervousness than did those in the other two groups, and new-onset mania developed in 2 patients in the tDCS group. Patients receiving escitalopram had more frequent sleepiness and obstipation than did those in the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS In a single-center trial, tDCS for the treatment of depression did not show noninferiority to escitalopram over a 10-week period and was associated with more adverse events. (Funded by Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo and others; ELECT-TDCS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01894815.)
引用
收藏
页码:2523 / 2533
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Amorim Patricia, 2000, Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, V22, P106
  • [2] Efficacy and Mood Conversion Rate of Short-Term Fluoxetine Monotherapy of Bipolar II Major Depressive Episode
    Amsterdam, Jay D.
    Shults, Justine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 30 (03) : 306 - 311
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, GUID IND INF CLIN TR
  • [4] [Anonymous], ESCALAS AVALIACAO CL
  • [5] A Systematic Review on the Acceptability and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Neuropsychiatry Trials
    Aparicio, Luana V. M.
    Guarienti, Fabiana
    Razza, Lais Boralli
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (05) : 671 - 681
  • [6] AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION
    BECK, AT
    ERBAUGH, J
    WARD, CH
    MOCK, J
    MENDELSOHN, M
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) : 561 - &
  • [7] Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016
    Bikson, Marom
    Grossman, Pnina
    Thomas, Chris
    Zannou, Adantchede Louis
    Jiang, Jimmy
    Adnan, Tatheer
    Mourdoukoutas, Antonios P.
    Kronberg, Greg
    Truong, Dennis
    Boggio, Paulo
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Charvet, Leigh
    Fregni, Felipe
    Fritsch, Brita
    Gillick, Bernadette
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    Hampstead, Benjamin M.
    Jankord, Ryan
    Kirton, Adam
    Knotkova, Helena
    Liebetanz, David
    Liu, Anli
    Loo, Colleen
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Reis, Janine
    Richardson, Jessica D.
    Rotenberg, Alexander
    Turkeltaub, Peter E.
    Woods, Adam J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (05) : 641 - 661
  • [8] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Episodes A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Chaimani, Anna
    Moffa, Adriano H.
    Razza, Lais B.
    Gattaz, Wagner F.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    [J]. JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 74 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [9] Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Moffa, Adriano H.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Palm, Ulrich
    Padberg, Frank
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Bennabi, Djamila
    Haffen, Emmanuel
    Alonzo, Angelo
    Loo, Colleen K.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 208 (06) : 522 - +
  • [10] The Sertraline vs Electrical Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study Results From a Factorial, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Valiengo, Leandro
    Baccaro, Alessandra
    Zanao, Tamires A.
    de Oliveira, Janaina F.
    Goulart, Alessandra
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Lotufo, Paulo A.
    Bensenor, Isabela M.
    Fregni, Felipe
    [J]. JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 70 (04) : 383 - 391