In-Bore Transrectal MRI-Guided Biopsy With Robotic Assistance in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of 57 Patients

被引:14
|
作者
Barral, Matthias [1 ]
Lefevre, Arnaud [2 ]
Camparo, Philippe [3 ]
Hoogenboom, Martijn [4 ]
Pierre, Thibaut [1 ]
Soyer, Philippe [1 ,5 ]
Cornud, Francois [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, AP HP, Dept Radiol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Clin Alma, Paris, France
[3] Ctr Pathol, Amiens, France
[4] Soteria Med, Arnhem, Netherlands
[5] Paris Descartes Univ, Paris, France
关键词
in-bore MRI guidance; prostatic cancer; robotic assistance; transrectal prostate biopsy; DATA SYSTEM; ULTRASOUND; FUSION; REGISTRATION; ACCURACY; FEASIBILITY; MANIPULATOR; VISIBILITY; STANDARD; LESIONS;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.19.21145
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to analyze the feasibility and potential role of robotic-assisted transrectal MRI-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 57 patients (mean age, 67 +/- 6 [SD] years; age range, 57-83 years; mean prostate-specific antigen level, 10.7 +/- 6.1 ng/mL) with a single prostatic lesion visible on biparametric MRI (T2-weighted and DW images) underwent robotic-assisted MRI-guided transrectal biopsy. The procedure was analyzed in terms of technical success, defined by an accurate alignment of the needle guide with the lesion; occupation time of the MRI room; number of cores; cancer detection rate (CDR); and complications. RESULTS. The biparametric MRI score was 3, 4, and 5 in 11 (19%), 30 (53%), and 16 (28%) of the 57 patients, respectively. Twenty-three lesions (23/57, 40%) originated in the peripheral zone and 34 (34/57, 60%) in the transition zone. Software-based adjustments of the robot allowed the needle guide to be aligned with the target in all lesions. The number of cores was one, two, three, and four in one (2%), 36 (63%), 18 (32%), and three (5%) patients, respectively. Obtaining more than two cores had no incremental value in determining the Gleason score or the maximum cancer core length (MCCL). The overall CDR for any cancer was 67% (38/57). It was 95% (36/38) for tumors with Gleason grade of more than 3 or MCCL greater than 3 mm and 53% (20/38) for tumors with Gleason score greater than 6. No complications were observed. The median occupation time of the MRI room was 37.8 +/- 9.7 minutes (range, 32-74 minutes). CONCLUSION. Robotic-assisted MRI-guided biopsy yields 100% technical success rate with a short MRI room occupation time and high CDRs using one or two cores.
引用
收藏
页码:W171 / W179
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The role of magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer; comparison between FUSION and "IN-BORE" approaches
    D'agostino, Daniele
    Casablanca, Carlo
    Bianchi, Federico Mineo
    Corsi, Paolo
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Giampaoli, Marco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Artibani, Walter
    Porreca, Angelo
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 73 (01): : 90 - 97
  • [12] 3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy
    Hosseiny, Melina
    Shakeri, Sepideh
    Felker, Ely R.
    Lu, David
    Sayre, James
    Ahuja, Preeti
    Raman, Steven S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (03) : 660 - 666
  • [13] Comparison of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive biopsy and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy for naive biopsy patients
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhang, Zhipeng
    Liu, Ming
    Zhu, Gang
    Roobol, Monique J.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [14] Direct Comparison of Targeted MRI-Guided Biopsy with Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in Patients with Previous Negative Prostate Biopsies
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Kruck, Stephan
    Kramer, Ulrich
    Gatidis, Sergios
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Roethke, Matthias
    Scharpf, Marcus
    Schilling, David
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 94 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [15] A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference
    Li, Chunmei
    Chen, Min
    Wan, Ben
    Yu, Jingying
    Liu, Ming
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Jianye
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (11) : 1395 - 1402
  • [16] 3T MR-guided in-bore transperineal prostate biopsy: A comparison of robotic and manual needle-guidance templates
    Tilak, Gaurie
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Olubiyi, Olutayo
    Fennessy, Fiona
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Tempany, Clare
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [17] Role of MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer and correlation of results with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy “TRUS”
    Islam Hussien Abd Elaziz Ahmed
    Hend Galal Eldeen Mohamed Ali Hassan
    Mohamed El Gharib Abo ElMaaty
    Shaima El Metwally ElDaisty El Metwally
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53
  • [18] Role of MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer and correlation of results with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy "TRUS"
    Ahmed, Islam Hussien Abd Elaziz
    Mohamed Ali Hassan, Hend Galal Eldeen
    Abo ElMaaty, Mohamed El Gharib
    ElDaisty El Metwally, Shaima El Metwally
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 53 (01)
  • [19] MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy
    Roethke, M.
    Anastasiadis, A. G.
    Lichy, M.
    Werner, M.
    Wagner, P.
    Kruck, S.
    Claussen, Claus D.
    Stenzl, A.
    Schlemmer, H. P.
    Schilling, D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 213 - 218
  • [20] A Study of Needle Image Artifact Localization in Confirmation Imaging of MRI-guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Cho, Nathan B.
    Iordachita, Iulian I.
    Guion, Peter
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    Whitcomb, Louis L.
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2011,