Retrofitting of a weaker building by coupling it to an adjacent stronger building using MR dampers

被引:29
作者
Abdeddaim, Mandi [1 ]
Ounis, Abdelhafid [1 ]
Shrimali, Mahendra K. [2 ]
Datta, Tushar K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mohamed Khider Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn & Hydraul, LARGHYDE Lab, BP 145 RP, Biskra 07000, Algeria
[2] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol Jaipur, Ctr Disaster Mitigat & Management, Jaipur 302017, Rajasthan, India
关键词
seismic retrofitting; weaker building; coupled buildings; magneto-rheological (MR) damper; noise contamination; pounding; SEMIACTIVE FUZZY CONTROL; SEISMIC RESPONSE; MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS; STRUCTURAL VIBRATION; VISCOELASTIC DAMPERS; PODIUM STRUCTURE; CONTROL-SYSTEMS; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; FLUID DAMPERS; PART II;
D O I
10.12989/sem.2017.62.2.197
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Among various retrofitting strategies, use of semi-active control for retrofitting a building structure has gained momentum in recent years. One of the techniques for such retrofitting is to connect a weaker building to an adjacent stronger building by semi-active devices, so that performances of a weaker building are significantly improved for seismic forces. In this paper, a ten storey weaker building is connected to an adjacent stronger building using magneto-rheological (MR) dampers, for primarily improving the performance of the weaker building in terms of displacement, drift and base shear. For this, a fuzzy logic controller is specifically developed by fuzzyfying the responses of the coupled system. The performance of the control strategy is compared with the passive-on and passive-off controls. Pounding Mitigation between the two buildings is also investigated using all three control strategies. The results show that there exists a fundamental frequency ratio between the two buildings for which maximum control of the weaker building response takes place with no penalty on the stronger building. There exists also a fundamental frequency ratio where control of the weaker building response is achieved at the expense of the amplification of the stronger building. However, coupling strategy always improves the possibility of pounding mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 208
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Pounding hazard mitigation between adjacent planar buildings using coupling strategy [J].
Abdeddaim M. ;
Ounis A. ;
Djedoui N. ;
Shrimali M.K. .
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2016, 6 (03) :603-617
[2]   Optimal control of adaptive/smart bridge structures [J].
Adeli, H ;
Saleh, A .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (02) :218-226
[3]  
Amiri GG, 2013, SCI IRAN, V20, P1695
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J STRUCT CONTROL
[5]  
Battaini M, 1998, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V27, P1267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(1998110)27:11<1267::AID-EQE782>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-D
[7]   Seismic performance evaluation and retrofitting with viscous fluid dampers of an existing bridge in Istanbul [J].
Bayramoglu, Guliz ;
Ozgen, Alpay ;
Altinok, Enver .
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2014, 49 (04) :463-477
[8]   Semiactive fuzzy control of the seismic response of building frames [J].
Bhardwaj, MK ;
Datta, TK .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2006, 132 (05) :791-799
[9]   Seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings connected with MR dampers [J].
Bharti, S. D. ;
Dumne, S. M. ;
Shrimali, M. K. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (08) :2122-2133
[10]   Integrated vibration control and health monitoring of building structures using semi-active friction dampers: Part II - Numerical investigation [J].
Chen, B. ;
Xu, Y. L. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2008, 30 (03) :573-587