The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

被引:1166
作者
Williamson, Paula R. [1 ]
Altman, Douglas G. [2 ]
Bagley, Heather [1 ]
Barnes, Karen L. [1 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [3 ]
Brookes, Sara T. [3 ]
Clarke, Mike [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Gargon, Elizabeth [1 ]
Gorst, Sarah [1 ]
Harman, Nicola [1 ]
Kirkham, Jamie J. [1 ]
McNair, Angus [3 ]
Prinsen, Cecilia A. C. [7 ]
Schmitt, Jochen [8 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [7 ]
Young, Bridget [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Biostat, MRC North West Hub Trials Methodol Res, Block F Waterhouse Bldg,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, MRC ConDuCT Hub Trials Methodol Res 2, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[5] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
[6] HRB Trials Methodol Res Network, Galway, Ireland
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Tech Univ Dresden, Med Fak, Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare, Dresden, Germany
关键词
Core outcome set; Clinical trial; COMET Initiative; Patients and the public; CORE OUTCOME SET; INITIATIVE DATABASE PROGRESS; SYSTEMIC-LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; OF-THE-LITERATURE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICAL-TRIALS; END-POINTS; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS; MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and practice, the outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public, health care professionals and others making decisions about health care. It is now widely acknowledged that insufficient attention has been paid to the choice of outcomes measured in clinical trials. Researchers are increasingly addressing this issue through the development and use of a core outcome set, an agreed standardised collection of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area. Accumulating work in this area has identified the need for guidance on the development, implementation, evaluation and updating of core outcome sets. This Handbook, developed by the COMET Initiative, brings together current thinking and methodological research regarding those issues. We recommend a four-step process to develop a core outcome set. The aim is to update the contents of the Handbook as further research is identified.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 50
页数:50
相关论文
共 228 条
[1]   A surveillance system to assess the need for updating systematic reviews. [J].
Ahmadzai N. ;
Newberry S.J. ;
Maglione M.A. ;
Tsertsvadze A. ;
Ansari M.T. ;
Hempel S. ;
Motala A. ;
Tsouros S. ;
Schneider Chafen J.J. ;
Shanman R. ;
Moher D. ;
Shekelle P.G. .
Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) :104
[2]   Key health outcomes for children and young people with neurodisability: qualitative research with young people and parents [J].
Allard, Amanda ;
Fellowes, Andrew ;
Shilling, Valerie ;
Janssens, Astrid ;
Beresford, Bryony ;
Morris, Christopher .
BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (04)
[3]   A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Simera, Iveta .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2016, 109 (02) :67-77
[4]   Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Moher, David ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (25) :2985-2997
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Cephalalgia, V11, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DEV PROTOCOL OBSERVA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, BMJ, DOI DOI 10.1136/bmj.c1938
[8]  
[Anonymous], OUR STAND SETS
[9]  
[Anonymous], SEL PRIOR GUID QUAL
[10]  
[Anonymous], INV COST CALC