Stress-based topology optimization with discrete geometric components

被引:67
作者
Zhang, Shanglong [1 ]
Gain, Arun L. [2 ]
Norato, Julian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Mech Engn, 191 Auditorium Rd,U-3139, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Caterpillar Inc, Champaign Simulat Ctr, 1901 S First St, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
Topology optimization; Geometry projection; Stress constraints; Bar structures; Plate structures; Design for manufacturing; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; PROJECTION METHOD; CONSTRAINTS; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2017.06.025
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, we introduce a framework for the stress-based topology optimization of structures made by the assembly of discrete geometric components, such as bars and plates, that are described by explicit geometry representations. To circumvent re-meshing upon design changes, we employ the geometry projection method to smoothly map the geometric components onto a continuous density field defined over a uniform finite element grid for analysis. The geometry projection is defined in a manner that prevents the singular optima phenomenon widely reported in the literature, and that effectively considers stresses only on the geometric components and not on the void region. As in previous work, a size variable is ascribed to each geometry component and penalized in the spirit of solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP), allowing the optimizer to entirely remove geometric components from the design. We demonstrate our method on the L-bracket benchmark for stress-based optimization problems in 2-d and 3-d. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, OPTISTRUCT US MAN V
  • [2] deal. II - A general-purpose object-oriented finite element library
    Bangerth, W.
    Hartmann, R.
    Kanschat, G.
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 2007, 33 (04):
  • [3] The deal.II Library, Version 8.4
    Bangerth, Wolfgang
    Davydov, Denis
    Heister, Timo
    Heltai, Luca
    Kanschat, Guido
    Kronbichler, Martin
    Maier, Matthias
    Turcksin, Bruno
    Wells, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2016, 24 (03) : 135 - 141
  • [4] Bell B., 2012, 12 AIAA AV TECHN INT, P5485
  • [5] Bendse Martin P., 1989, Struct Optim, V1, P193, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01650949, 10.1007/BF01650949]
  • [6] On an alternative approach to stress constraints relaxation in topology optimization
    Bruggi, Matteo
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 36 (02) : 125 - 141
  • [7] A LIMITED MEMORY ALGORITHM FOR BOUND CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION
    BYRD, RH
    LU, PH
    NOCEDAL, J
    ZHU, CY
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 1995, 16 (05) : 1190 - 1208
  • [8] Stress constrained topology optimization with free-form design domains
    Cai, Shouyu
    Zhang, Weihong
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 289 : 267 - 290
  • [9] epsilon-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization
    Cheng, GD
    Guo, X
    [J]. STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 13 (04) : 258 - 266
  • [10] Duysinx P, 1998, INT J NUMER METH ENG, V43, P1453